Assessing Glaucoma Progression Using Machine Learning Trained on Longitudinal Visual Field and Clinical Data

被引:59
作者
Dixit, Avyuk [1 ]
Yohannan, Jithin [2 ]
Boland, Michael V. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Dept Ophthalmol, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Clinical data; Glaucoma; Machine learning; Progression; RNN; Visual field; PREDICTION; CRITERIA; TRIALS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.020
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Rule-based approaches to determining glaucoma progression from visual fields (VFs) alone are discordant and have tradeoffs. To detect better when glaucoma progression is occurring, we used a longitudinal data set of merged VF and clinical data to assess the performance of a convolutional long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network. Design: Retrospective analysis of longitudinal clinical and VF data. Participants: From 2 initial datasets of 672 123 VF results from 213 254 eyes and 350 437 samples of clinical data, persons at the intersection of both datasets with 4 or more VF results and corresponding baseline clinical data (cup-to-disc ratio, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure) were included. After exclusion criteria-specifically the removal of VFs with high false-positive and false-negative rates and entries with missing data-were applied to ensure reliable data, 11 242 eyes remained. Methods: Three commonly used glaucoma progression algorithms (VF index slope, mean deviation slope, and pointwise linear regression) were used to define eyes as stable or progressing. Two machine learning models, one exclusively trained on VF data and another trained on both VF and clinical data, were tested. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) calculated on a held-out test set and mean accuracies from threefold cross-validation were used to compare the performance of the machine learning models. Results: The convolutional LSTM network demonstrated 91% to 93% accuracy with respect to the different conventional glaucoma progression algorithms given 4 consecutive VF results for each participant. The model that was trained on both VF and clinical data (AUC, 0.89-0.93) showed better diagnostic ability than a model exclusively trained on VF results (AUC, 0.79-0.82; P < 0.001). Conclusions: A convolutional LSTM architecture can capture local and global trends in VFs over time. It is well suited to assessing glaucoma progression because of its ability to extract spatiotemporal features that other algorithms cannot. Supplementing VF results with clinical data improves the model's ability to assess glaucoma progression and better reflects the way clinicians manage data when managing glaucoma. (C) 2020 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1026
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Long short-term memory
    Hochreiter, S
    Schmidhuber, J
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1997, 9 (08) : 1735 - 1780
  • [2] Detecting Visual Field Progression
    Aref, Ahmad A.
    Budenz, Donald L.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 124 (12) : S51 - S56
  • [3] A Method to Measure and Predict Rates of Regional Visual Field Decay in Glaucoma
    Caprioli, Joseph
    Mock, Dennis
    Bitrian, Elena
    Afifi, Abdelmonem A.
    Yu, Fei
    Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
    Coleman, Anne L.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (07) : 4765 - 4773
  • [4] Rates of Glaucomatous Visual Field Change in a Large Clinical Population
    Chauhan, Balwantray C.
    Malik, Rizwan
    Shuba, Lesya M.
    Rafuse, Paul E.
    Nicolela, Marcelo T.
    Artes, Paul H.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (07) : 4135 - 4143
  • [5] Finite State Automata and Simple Recurrent Networks
    Cleeremans, Axel
    Servan-Schreiber, David
    McClelland, James L.
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1989, 1 (03) : 372 - 381
  • [6] Improvement of the visual field index in clinical glaucoma care
    Cohen, Shawn L.
    Rosen, Aaron I.
    Tan, Xianming
    Kingdom, Frederick A. A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2016, 51 (06): : 445 - 451
  • [7] Intervals between Visual Field Tests When Monitoring the Glaucomatous Patient: Wait-and-See Approach
    Crabb, David P.
    Garway-Heath, David F.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2012, 53 (06) : 2770 - 2776
  • [8] Machine learning for comprehensive forecasting of Alzheimer's Disease progression
    Fisher, Charles K.
    Smith, Aaron M.
    Walsh, Jonathan R.
    Simone, Adam J.
    Edgar, Chris
    Jack, Clifford R.
    Holtzman, David
    Russell, David
    Hill, Derek
    Grosset, Donald
    Wood, Fred
    Vanderstichele, Hugo
    Morris, John
    Blennown, Kaj
    Marek, Ken
    Shaw, Leslie M.
    Albert, Marilyn
    Weiner, Michael
    Fox, Nick
    Aisen, Paul
    Cole, Patricia E.
    Petersen, Ronald
    Sherer, Todd
    Kubick, Wayne
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [9] Combining optical coherence tomography with visual field data to rapidly detect disease progression in glaucoma: a diagnostic accuracy study
    Garway-Heath, David F.
    Zhu, Haogang
    Cheng, Qian
    Morgan, Katy
    Frost, Chris
    Crabb, David P.
    Ho, Tuan-Anh
    Agiomyrgiannakis, Yannis
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 22 (04) : 1 - +
  • [10] Giraud JM, 2010, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V51