Safe timing for an urgent Caesarean section: what is the evidence to guide policy?

被引:6
作者
Homer, Caroline S. E. [1 ]
Catling-Paull, Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Ctr Midwifery Child & Family Hlth, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
DECISION-TO-DELIVERY; INTERVAL; EMERGENCY; INCISION; TIME; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1071/AH11059
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To determine, from the evidence, what is the optimum decision to delivery (DDI) intervals in emergency Caesarean sections (CS). The aim of the study was to help guide policy in maternity services and identify issues relating to DDI and safe practice in maternity care. Method. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Assessment of the quality of eligible papers was undertaken using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) rating. Results. There is no strong evidence that a DDI of 30 min or less is associated with improved outcomes for babies or mothers. Some evidence suggests that a DDI of greater than 30 min but less than 75 min confers benefit, but these findings were confounded by the indications for the emergency CS. Conclusion. Urgent CS should occur as soon as possible, but there is insufficient evidence to support a definite time frame, such as 30 min. A consistency of approach and nomenclature in describing the urgency of CS is necessary, which would enable criteria for further audit regarding DDI. Staff training should be addressed to improve transfer systems for CS. Antenatal risk assessment and congruence with role delineation and service delivery capacity is important.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 281
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
American Academy of Pediatrics & American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2002, GUID PER CAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, GUID PER CAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], LEV EV GRAD REC DEV
[4]   Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes [J].
Bloom, Steven L. ;
Leveno, Kenneth J. ;
Spong, Catherine Y. ;
Gilbert, Sharon ;
Hauth, John C. ;
Landon, Mark B. ;
Varner, Michael W. ;
Moawad, Atef H. ;
Caritis, Steve N. ;
Harper, Margaret ;
Wapner, Ronald J. ;
Sorokin, Yoram ;
Miodovnik, Menachem ;
O'Sullivan, Mary J. ;
Sibai, Baha M. ;
Langer, Oded ;
Gabbe, Steven G. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (01) :6-11
[5]  
Centre for Epidemiology and Research, 2010, NSW MOTH BAB 2007
[6]  
Chauhan SP, 1997, J REPROD MED, V42, P347
[7]   Identification of Factors Influencing the Decision-to-Delivery Interval in Emergency Caesarean Sections [J].
Chauleur, C. ;
Collet, F. ;
Furtos, C. ;
Nourrissat, A. ;
Seffert, P. ;
Chauvin, F. .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2009, 68 (04) :248-254
[8]   Planned Place of Birth in New Zealand: Does it Affect Mode of Birth and Intervention Rates Among Low-Risk Women? [J].
Davis, Deborah ;
Baddock, Sally ;
Pairman, Sally ;
Hunter, Marion ;
Benn, Cheryl ;
Wilson, Don ;
Dixon, Lesley ;
Herbison, Peter .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2011, 38 (02) :111-119
[9]  
Division of Health Sciences, 2005, CRIT APPR TOOLS CASP
[10]  
Garling P., 2008, Special Commission of Inquiry: Acute Care Services in NSW Public Hospitals