Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis

被引:63
作者
Deng, Qiangyu [1 ]
Tang, Bihan [1 ]
Xue, Chen [1 ]
Liu, Yuan [1 ]
Liu, Xu [1 ]
Lv, Yipeng [1 ]
Zhang, Lulu [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Coll Hlth Serv, Dept Mil Hlth Management, 800 Xiangyin Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
基金
国家自然科学基金重大项目; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Injury Severity Score; New Injury Severity Score; mortality; meta-analysis; TRAUMA PATIENTS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph13080825
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Description of the anatomical severity of injuries in trauma patients is important. While the Injury Severity Score has been regarded as the "gold standard" since its creation, several studies have indicated that the New Injury Severity Score is better. Therefore, we aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the accuracy of the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score in predicting mortality. Methods: Two researchers independently searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases and included studies from which the exact number of true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative results could be extracted. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies checklist criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using Meta-DiSc. Meta-regression, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the source(s) of heterogeneity and factor(s) affecting the accuracy of the New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in predicting mortality. Results: The heterogeneity of the 11 relevant studies (total n = 11,866) was high (I-2 > 80%). The meta-analysis using a random-effects model resulted in sensitivity of 0.64, specificity of 0.93, positive likelihood ratio of 5.11, negative likelihood ratio of 0.27, diagnostic odds ratio of 27.75, and area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.9009 for the Injury Severity Score; and sensitivity of 0.71, specificity of 0.87, positive likelihood ratio of 5.22, negative likelihood ratio of 0.20, diagnostic odds ratio of 24.74, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9095 for the New Injury Severity Score. Conclusion: The New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score have similar abilities in predicting mortality. Further research is required to determine the appropriate use of the Injury Severity Score or the New Injury Severity Score based on specific patient condition and trauma type.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Value of the Glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial blood pressure score for predicting the mortality of major trauma patients presenting to the emergency department [J].
Ahun, Erhan ;
Koksal, Ozlem ;
Sigirli, Deniz ;
Torun, Gokhan ;
Donmez, Serdar Suha ;
Armagan, Erol .
ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2014, 20 (04) :241-247
[2]  
[Anonymous], BMC MED RES METHODOL
[3]  
Aydin SA, 2008, ULUS TRAVMA ACIL CER, V14, P308
[4]   INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE [J].
BAKER, SP ;
ONEILL, B ;
HADDON, W ;
LONG, WB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03) :187-196
[5]   NISS predicts postinjury multiple organ failure better than the ISS [J].
Balogh, Z ;
Offner, PJ ;
Moore, EE ;
Biffl, WL .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2000, 48 (04) :624-627
[6]   Childhood falls: characteristics, outcome, and comparison of the Injury Severity Score and New Injury Severity Score [J].
Bulut, M ;
Koksal, O ;
Korkmaz, A ;
Turan, M ;
Ozguc, H .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (07) :540-545
[7]   A NEW CHARACTERIZATION OF INJURY SEVERITY [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
COPES, WS ;
SACCO, WJ ;
LAWNICK, MM ;
BAIN, LW ;
GANN, DS ;
GENNARELLI, T ;
MACKENZIE, E ;
SCHWAITZBERG, S .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1990, 30 (05) :539-546
[8]   Mortality Factors Regarding the Injury Severity Score in Elderly Trauma Patients [J].
Chiang, Wen-Kuang ;
Huang, Shu-Tien ;
Chang, Wen-Han ;
Huang, Ming-Yuan ;
Chien, Ding-Kuo ;
Tsai, Cheng-Ho .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY, 2012, 6 (03) :192-195
[9]  
Domingues Cristiane de Alencar, 2011, Rev. esc. enferm. USP, V45, P1353
[10]   Comparing logistic models based on modified GCS motor component with other prognostic tools in prediction of mortality: Results of study in 7226 trauma patients [J].
Eftekhar, B ;
Zarei, MR ;
Ghodsi, M ;
MoezArdatan, K ;
Zargar, M ;
Ketabchi, E .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2005, 36 (08) :900-904