Comparative analysis of Si, SiC and GaN based quasi impedance source inverter

被引:3
|
作者
Devi, S. [1 ]
Seyezhai, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar Coll Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Renewable Energy Convers Lab, Kalavakkam 603110, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Inverter; Silicon carbide; Gallium nitride; Impedance source; Efficiency;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.685
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The impedance source inverter reduces the number of stages of energy conversion due to its ability to increase the output voltage. Silicon based semiconductor power devices are commonly used for inverters, but as the voltage and current rating of the inverter increases with demand for high efficiency, the Silicon Carbide and Gallium Nitride power devices are most preferred. These wide bandgap devices enable the switches to be operated at high switching frequencies and with the increase in switching frequency, the size of the impedance network elements present in the inverter can be reduced. Thus, obtaining a compact and highly efficient inverter module. This paper presents a comparative analysis of Silicon, Silicon - Carbide and Gallium Nitride based quasi - impedance source inverters through simulation study. The performance of the inverters is analysed based on its efficiency, voltage stress and current stress across the switches and the results are validated.Copyright (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the Second International Conference on Engineering Materials, Metallurgy and Manufacturing.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 792
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of SiC and GaN Devices for Front-End Isolation of Quasi-Z-Source Cascaded Multilevel Photovoltaic Inverter
    Liu, Yushan
    Ge, Baoming
    Abu-Rub, Haitham
    Zhang, Haiyu
    Balog, Robert S.
    2016 IEEE ENERGY CONVERSION CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (ECCE), 2016,
  • [2] Comparative Analysis of Impedance Source-SiC Converters for Traction Systems
    Fernandez, E.
    Sala, V.
    Paredes, A.
    Romeral, L.
    2017 11TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPATIBILITY, POWER ELECTRONICS AND POWER ENGINEERING (CPE-POWERENG), 2017, : 464 - 470
  • [3] SiC and GaN Based BSNPC Inverter for Photovoltaic Systems
    Gurpinar, Emre
    Castellazzi, Alberto
    2015 17TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON POWER ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (EPE'15 ECCE-EUROPE), 2015,
  • [4] Design of SiC-Based Single-Phase Quasi-Z-Source Inverter
    Liu, Yushan
    Abu-Rub, Haitham
    Wu, Yichang
    Ghazi, Khalid Ahamed
    PROCEEDINGS 2018 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPATIBILITY, POWER ELECTRONICS AND POWER ENGINEERING (CPE-POWERENG 2018), 2018,
  • [5] Comparative Analysis of Si- and GaN-Based Single-Phase Transformer-Less PV Grid-Tied Inverter
    Alatawi, Khaled
    Almasoudi, Fahad
    Manandhar, Mahesh
    Matin, Mohammad
    ELECTRONICS, 2018, 7 (03):
  • [6] Comparative Evaluation of SiC/GaN/Si-based Drive-train Inverters for Light Electric-Vehicles
    Saha, Jaydeep
    Manohar, Sai Srinivas
    Sundararajan, Prasanth
    Panda, Sanjib Kumar
    2024 IEEE APPLIED POWER ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, APEC, 2024, : 822 - 829
  • [7] LCCT (Inductor-Capacitor-Capacitor-Trans) Quasi Impedance-Source Inverter
    Jung, Young-Gook
    Shin, Yeon-Soo
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 18 (06) : 4139 - 4150
  • [8] An Efficiency Improvement Method for Si/SiC Hybrid Switch based Inverter
    Liu, Zeng
    Peng, Zishun
    Ou, Ling
    Peng, Xiaogui
    Wang, Jun
    2020 THIRTY-FIFTH ANNUAL IEEE APPLIED POWER ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION (APEC 2020), 2020, : 1094 - 1097
  • [9] SiC Mosfet versus Si IGBT based H-Bridge quasi-Z-Source converter
    Gajowik, Tomasz
    Mozdzynski, Kamil
    Malinowski, Mariusz
    Ghazi, Khalid
    Abu-Rub, Haitam
    PROCEEDINGS 2018 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPATIBILITY, POWER ELECTRONICS AND POWER ENGINEERING (CPE-POWERENG 2018), 2018,
  • [10] Application of SiC JMOS and SiC DMOS in Si/SiC Hybrid Switch Based Single-phase Inverter
    Li Z.
    Wang J.
    Yu J.
    Jiang X.
    Shen Z.
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2019, 39 (19): : 5674 - 5682