A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods

被引:534
|
作者
Sun, Chia-Chi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Technol Management, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
关键词
Fuzzy set; Performance evaluation; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM); ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; BENCHMARKING; SELECTION; DESIGN; SERVICE; SYSTEM; SCALE; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) research has developed rapidly and has become a main area of research for dealing with complex decision problems. The purpose of the paper is to explore the performance evaluation model. This paper develops an evaluation model based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution, fuzzy TOPSIS, to help the industrial practitioners for the performance evaluation in a fuzzy environment where the vagueness and subjectivity are handled with linguistic values parameterized by triangular fuzzy numbers. The proposed method enables decision analysts to better understand the complete evaluation process and provide a more accurate, effective, and systematic decision support tool. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7745 / 7754
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of Eco design alternatives by integrating AHP and TOPSIS methodology under a fuzzy environment
    Ng, Chun Yu
    Chuah, Kong Bieng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 7 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [22] Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection
    Baykasoglu, Adil
    Kaplanoglu, Vahit
    Durmusoglu, Zeynep D. U.
    Sahin, Cenk
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (03) : 899 - 907
  • [23] A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to software requirements selection
    Nazim, Mohd.
    Mohammad, Chaudhary Wali
    Sadiq, Mohd.
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 61 (12) : 10851 - 10870
  • [24] An Evaluation Model Based on the Fuzzy AHP for Teleoperation Performance
    Wang, Chao
    Niu, Jianwei
    Zhang, Yijing
    Pan, Dan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 29 (1-2): : 42 - 52
  • [25] A hybrid fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS model for evaluation of manufacturing relocation decisions
    Movin Sequeira
    Anders Adlemo
    Per Hilletofth
    Operations Management Research, 2023, 16 : 164 - 191
  • [26] A hybrid fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS model for evaluation of manufacturing relocation decisions
    Sequeira, Movin
    Adlemo, Anders
    Hilletofth, Per
    OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (01) : 164 - 191
  • [27] A business process decision model for client evaluation using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS
    Hmu Tin K.M.M.
    Lau H.
    Lau, Henry (h.lau@uws.edu.au), 1600, Inderscience Publishers, 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (35): : 80 - 99
  • [28] Hybrid Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision Model for Aquaculture Species Selection
    Padma, T.
    Shantharajah, S. P.
    Ramadoss, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2022, 21 (03) : 999 - 1030
  • [29] Integrating Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping and Picture Fuzzy TOPSIS for Long-Term Retail Performance Evaluation
    Sari, Irem Ucal
    Ozkirim, Ceren
    Ilgin, Ugurcan
    INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS, INFUS 2024 CONFERENCE, VOL 1, 2024, 1088 : 630 - 637
  • [30] Operating system selection using fuzzy AHP and topsis methods
    Balli, Serkan
    Korukoǧlu, Serdar
    Mathematical and Computational Applications, 2009, 14 (02) : 119 - 130