Field-Testing and Refinement of the Organisational Health Literacy Responsiveness Self-Assessment (Org-HLR) Tool and Process

被引:18
作者
Trezona, Anita [1 ]
Dodson, Sarity [1 ,2 ]
Fitzsimon, Emma [3 ]
LaMontagne, Anthony D. [1 ]
Osborne, Richard H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Fred Hollows Fdn, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[3] Inner North West Primary Care Partnership, Brunswick, Vic 3056, Australia
[4] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Hlth Arts & Design, Ctr Global Hlth & Equ, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
health literacy; health literacy responsiveness; health systems; access; health service improvement; self-assessment; Org-HLR self-assessment tool; SERVICES; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17031000
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Health literacy refers to the skills and knowledge that influence a person's ability to access, understand and use information to make health-related decisions, which are influenced by the complexity of their health needs and the demands health services place on them. The aim of this study was to field-test the Organisational Health Literacy Responsiveness (Org-HLR) tool and process to determine their utility in assessing health literacy responsiveness and for supporting organisations to plan health literacy-related improvement activities. Four organisations in Victoria, Australia, field-tested the Org-HLR tool. Data were collected through direct observation, participant feedback, and focus groups. Forty-three individuals participated in field-testing activities, and 20 took part in focus group meetings. Themes relating to the applicability and utility of the Org-HLR self-assessment tool and process were identified. Field-testing resulted in a number of refinements to the tool and process. Twenty-eight indicators were removed, 29 were rephrased to improve their clarity, and four new indicators were added. The revised Org-HLR self-assessment tool contains six dimensions, 22 sub-dimensions and 110 performance indicators. The Org-HLR tool and process were perceived as useful for assessing health literacy responsiveness, prioritising improvement activities, and establishing a benchmark for monitoring and evaluation of improvements over time. Testing generated an improved Org-HLR tool and assessment process that are likely to have utility across a broad range of health and social service sector organisations.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]  
Institute of Medicine, HLTH LITERACY PRESCR
[12]   Patient health literacy and participation in the health-care process [J].
Ishikawa, Hirono ;
Yano, Eiji .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2008, 11 (02) :113-122
[13]   Health literacy of recently hospitalised patients: a cross-sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) [J].
Jessup, Rebecca L. ;
Osborne, Richard H. ;
Beauchamp, Alison ;
Bourne, Allison ;
Buchbinder, Rachelle .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17 :1-12
[14]   Toward a Systems Approach to Health Literacy Research [J].
Koh, Howard K. ;
Baur, Cynthia ;
Brach, Cindy ;
Harris, Linda M. ;
Rowden, Jessica N. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2013, 18 (01) :1-5
[15]   Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations [J].
Levesque, Jean-Frederic ;
Harris, Mark F. ;
Russell, Grant .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2013, 12
[16]   What Do Health Literacy and Cultural Competence Have in Common? Calling for a Collaborative Health Professional Pedagogy [J].
Lie, Desiree ;
Carter-Pokras, Olivia ;
Braun, Bonnie ;
Coleman, Cliff .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2012, 17 :13-22
[17]   Assessing organizational capacity to deliver HIV prevention services collaboratively: Tales from the field [J].
Miller, RL ;
Bedney, BJ ;
Guenther-Grey, C .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2003, 30 (05) :582-600
[18]  
Nutbeam D., 1998, HLTH PROM GLOSS
[19]  
Pleasant A., 2013, A Prescription is Not Enough: Improving Public Health with Health Literacy
[20]   Self-assessment using the business excellence model: A study of practice and process [J].
Ritchie, L ;
Dale, BG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2000, 66 (03) :241-254