Field-Testing and Refinement of the Organisational Health Literacy Responsiveness Self-Assessment (Org-HLR) Tool and Process

被引:18
作者
Trezona, Anita [1 ]
Dodson, Sarity [1 ,2 ]
Fitzsimon, Emma [3 ]
LaMontagne, Anthony D. [1 ]
Osborne, Richard H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Fred Hollows Fdn, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[3] Inner North West Primary Care Partnership, Brunswick, Vic 3056, Australia
[4] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Hlth Arts & Design, Ctr Global Hlth & Equ, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
health literacy; health literacy responsiveness; health systems; access; health service improvement; self-assessment; Org-HLR self-assessment tool; SERVICES; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17031000
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Health literacy refers to the skills and knowledge that influence a person's ability to access, understand and use information to make health-related decisions, which are influenced by the complexity of their health needs and the demands health services place on them. The aim of this study was to field-test the Organisational Health Literacy Responsiveness (Org-HLR) tool and process to determine their utility in assessing health literacy responsiveness and for supporting organisations to plan health literacy-related improvement activities. Four organisations in Victoria, Australia, field-tested the Org-HLR tool. Data were collected through direct observation, participant feedback, and focus groups. Forty-three individuals participated in field-testing activities, and 20 took part in focus group meetings. Themes relating to the applicability and utility of the Org-HLR self-assessment tool and process were identified. Field-testing resulted in a number of refinements to the tool and process. Twenty-eight indicators were removed, 29 were rephrased to improve their clarity, and four new indicators were added. The revised Org-HLR self-assessment tool contains six dimensions, 22 sub-dimensions and 110 performance indicators. The Org-HLR tool and process were perceived as useful for assessing health literacy responsiveness, prioritising improvement activities, and establishing a benchmark for monitoring and evaluation of improvements over time. Testing generated an improved Org-HLR tool and assessment process that are likely to have utility across a broad range of health and social service sector organisations.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Alper J, 2016, INT HLTH LIT CULT CO
[2]  
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2014, Health literacy: Taking action to improve safety and quality
[3]   Health literacy: applying current concepts to improve health services and reduce health inequalities [J].
Batterham, R. W. ;
Hawkins, M. ;
Collins, P. A. ;
Buchbinder, R. ;
Osborne, R. H. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 132 :3-12
[4]  
Brach C, 2012, 10 ATTRIBUTES HLTH C
[5]  
Department of Health and Human Services, 2015, PRIM CAR PARTN
[6]  
DeWalt D.A., 2013, Integrating Health Literacy with Health Care Performance Measurement
[7]  
Ford M.W, 2017, BUSINESS HORIZONS
[8]  
Ford M.W., 2001, Quality Management Journal, V8, P9
[9]  
Fountain M, 1998, TOTAL QUAL MANAGE, V9, pS95
[10]   Health Literacy and Emergency Department Outcomes: A Systematic Review [J].
Herndon, Jill Boylston ;
Chaney, Michelle ;
Carden, Donna .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 57 (04) :334-345