How big is big? How often is often? Characterizing Texas petroleum refining upset air emissions

被引:32
作者
McCoy, Britney J. [1 ]
Fischbeck, Paul S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gerard, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, CSIR, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Lawrence Univ, Dept Econ, Appleton, WI 54911 USA
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
Emissions characterization; Upset air emissions; Petroleum refinery; Criteria pollutants; OZONE FORMATION; HOUSTON; VARIABILITY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.07.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This work examines the magnitude and frequency of Texas petroleum refineries upset air emissions over a 44-month period. Upset emissions occur during plant start-ups, shut-downs, maintenance, malfunctions and flaring incidents, and these emissions are typically exempt from regulation. These emissions contain a variety of chemicals, including benzene, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and butadiene. Unlike other states, Texas has detailed reporting requirements, regulations in place, and an extensive upset emissions database. A key scientific and public policy question is whether upset emissions have significant impacts on local air quality and public health. However, it is not possible to address this question without first understanding the magnitude and properties of upsets. We merge related databases to examine over 3,900 upset emission events and find that upset emissions are significant in both size and occurrence when compared to routine operation emissions. It is determined that these events are not random, being more likely to occur during the summer, in the morning, and early in the workweek. A regional analysis of Port Arthur suggests that upset emissions from co-located refineries are equivalent to having an additional refinery within the region. Because of uncertainties within the reporting process and an obvious underestimation by some refineries, there is a need for better tracking of upset emissions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4230 / 4239
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BUENO V, 2000, FREQUENT ROUTINE FLA, P20207
[2]   Comparison of VOC emissions inventory data with source apportionment results for Houston, TX [J].
Buzcu-Guven, Birnur ;
Fraser, Matthew P. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (20) :5032-5043
[3]  
CHRISTOFK TJ, 2009, EXCESS EMISSIONS STR, P20207
[4]  
Environmental Integrity Project and the Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention (EIP-GHASP), 2004, WHOS COUNT SYST UND
[5]   Tracking petroleum refinery emission events using lanthanum and lanthanides as elemental markers for PM2.5 [J].
Kulkarni, Pranav ;
Chellam, Shankararaman ;
Fraser, Matthew P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (19) :6748-6754
[6]  
LERNER S, 2007, PORT ARTHUR TEXAS PU, P20207
[7]   Hydrocarbon emissions from industrial release events in the Houston- Galveston area and their impact on ozone formation [J].
Murphy, CF ;
Allen, DT .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (21) :3785-3798
[8]   Reductions in ozone concentrations due to controls on variability in industrial flare emissions in Houston, Texas [J].
Nam, Junsang ;
Webster, Mort ;
Kimura, Yosuke ;
Jeffries, Harvey ;
Vizuete, William ;
Allen, David T. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (18) :4198-4211
[9]  
ORGAN R, 2006, COMMUNICATION, P20207
[10]  
Speight J., 2005, ENV ANAL TECHNOLOGY