Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study

被引:41
作者
Hope, Nicole [1 ]
Rombauts, Luk [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash IVF, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
IVF; patient information; provision of information; randomized controlled trial; single embryo transfer; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; DECISION-MAKING; INFORMATION; PREGNANCY; TRIAL; RATES; IVF; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIANS; IVF/ICSI;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.080
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess whether provision of an educational DVD was more effective in increasing the uptake of elective single embryo transfers (eSET) than an educational brochure in an IVF population. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Private IVF clinic. Patient(s): One hundred thirty-one couples starting their first cycle of IVF were randomized to receive either an educational DVD or brochure. Intervention(s): Sixty-four couples received the DVD and 67 couples received the brochure. Both provided identical factual information on outcomes and risks of twin pregnancies. The DVD also included two short interviews with mothers of twins. Main Outcome Measure(s): Preference for eSET after the intervention. Result(s): There were no significant differences in fertility history or demographics. After the interventions, both groups demonstrated significantly improved knowledge. Patients in the DVD group were significantly more likely to prefer eSET compared with patients who read the brochure (82.6% vs. 66.7%). Conclusion(s): Patients exposed to the educational DVD were significantly more likely to prefer eSET. Provision of an educational DVD, such as the one used in the present study, may provide an affordable and more effective means of delivering health risk information. (Fertil Steril(R) 2010;94:489-95. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 495
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Baor L, 2005, INT J FERTIL WOMEN M, V50, P129
[2]   Differences in female and male perception of information and decision-making in single-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization in Sweden [J].
Blennborn, M. ;
Hellberg, D. ;
Nilsson, S. .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2007, 24 (08) :337-342
[3]   The couple's decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer? [J].
Blennborn, M ;
Nilsson, S ;
Hillervik, C ;
Hellberg, D .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (05) :1292-1297
[4]   A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI [J].
De Sutter, P ;
Gerris, J ;
Dhont, M .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (11) :2891-2896
[5]  
De Sutter P, 2003, Reprod Biomed Online, V6, P464
[6]   What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception [J].
de Wit, John B. F. ;
Das, Enny ;
Vet, Raymond .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 27 (01) :110-115
[7]   Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme [J].
Gerris, J ;
De Neubourg, D ;
Mangelschots, K ;
Van Royen, E ;
Vercruyssen, M ;
Barudy-Vasquez, J ;
Valkenburg, M ;
Ryckaert, G .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (10) :2626-2631
[8]   Prospective trial of a video educational tool for radiation oncology patients [J].
Hahn, CA ;
Fish, LJ ;
Dunn, RH ;
Halperin, EC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (06) :609-612
[9]   Successful assisted reproductive technology: The beauty of one [J].
Hogue, CJR .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 100 (05) :1017-1019
[10]   Discounting and clinical decision making:: Physicians, patients, the general public, and the management of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Höjgård, S ;
Enemark, U ;
Lyttkens, CH ;
Lindgren, A ;
Troëng, T ;
Weibull, H .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 11 (04) :355-370