Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain AVMs: Role of interobserver variation in target definition on digital subtraction angiography

被引:37
|
作者
Buis, DR
Lagerwaard, FJ
Barkhof, F
Dirven, CMF
Lycklama, GJ
Meijer, OWM
van den Berg, R
Langendijk, HA
Slotman, BJ
Vandertop, WP
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2005年 / 62卷 / 01期
关键词
angiography; digital subtraction; cerebral angiography; intracranial arteriovenous malformations; radiosurgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.080
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the extent of interobserver variation in contouring arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with respect to volume, spatial localization, and dosimetry and correlated our findings with the clinical outcome. Methods and Materials: Thirty-one patients who had undergone radiosurgery for brain AVMs were studied. Six clinicians independently contoured the nidus on the original DSA. As a measure of variation, the ratio between the volumes of agreement and the corresponding encompassing volumes, as well as the absolute positional shift between the individual target volumes were derived. Using the original treatment plan, the dosimetric coverage of the individually contoured volumes with standard collimators was compared with a similar plan using dynamic conformal arcs. Results: The mean contoured nidus volume was 3.6 +/- 5.6 cm(3). The mean agreement ratio was 0.45 +/- 0.18 for all possible pairs of observers. The mean absolute positional shift between individually contoured volumes was 2.8 +/- 2.6 mm. These differences were more marked in previously treated groups and tended to be more pronounced in those with treatment failure. The mean coverage of the individual volumes by the 80% prescription isodose was 88.1% +/- 3.2% using conventional collimators and 78.9% +/- 4.4% using dynamic conformal arcs (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Substantial interobserver variations exist when contouring brain AVMs on DSA for the purpose of radiosurgical planning. Such variations may result in underdosage to the AVM and, thereby, contribute to treatment failure. The consequences of contouring variations may increase with the use of more conformal radiosurgical techniques. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 252
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital subtraction angiography for arteriovenous malformations in stereotactic radiosurgery
    Piovan, E
    DalSasso, M
    Urbani, GP
    Sartori, R
    Foroni, R
    Benati, A
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 66 : 57 - 62
  • [2] Delineation of brain AVMs on MR-angiography for the purpose of stereotactic radiosurgery
    Buis, Dennis R.
    Lagerwaard, Frank J.
    Dirven, Clemens M. F.
    Barkhof, Frederik
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Van Den Berg, Rene
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Vandertop, W. Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (01): : 308 - 316
  • [3] Image distortion correction of digital subtraction angiography in stereotactic radiosurgery
    Hoevels, M
    Treuer, H
    Thesen, N
    Landwehr, P
    Heindel, W
    Muller, RP
    Sturm, V
    CAR '96: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY, 1996, 1124 : 998 - 998
  • [4] Planning Evaluation of Cone-beam CT Angiography for Target Delineation in Stereotactic Radiosurgery of AVMs
    Kang, J.
    Huang, J.
    Gailloud, P.
    Rigamonti, D.
    Bernard, V.
    Ehtiati, T.
    Ford, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S770 - S771
  • [5] Cyst formation after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain AVMs
    Ye, Zengpanpan
    Ai, Xiaolin
    You, Chao
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 129 (01) : 259 - 261
  • [6] Cyst formation after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain AVMs Response
    Ilyas, Adeel
    Chen, Ching-Jen
    Ding, Dale
    Mastorakos, Panagiotis
    Taylor, Davis G.
    Pomeraniec, Jonathan
    Lee, Cheng-Chia
    Sheehan, Jason P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 129 (01) : 261 - 262
  • [7] Interobserver variability in the interpretation of renal digital subtraction angiography
    Paul, JF
    Cherrak, I
    Jaulent, MC
    Chatellier, G
    Plouin, PF
    Degoulet, P
    Gaux, JC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (05) : 1285 - 1288
  • [8] Interobserver variability in target definition for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation
    van der Ree, Martijn H.
    Cuculich, Phillip S.
    van Herk, Marcel
    Hugo, Geoffrey D.
    Balt, Jippe C.
    Bates, Matthew
    Ho, Gordon
    Pruvot, Etienne
    Herrera-Siklody, Claudia
    Hoeksema, Wiert F.
    Lee, Justin
    Lloyd, Michael S.
    Kemme, Michiel J. B.
    Sacher, Frederic
    Tixier, Romain
    Verhoeff, Joost J. C.
    Balgobind, Brian V.
    Robinson, Clifford G.
    Rasch, Coen R. N.
    Postema, Pieter G.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [9] Integration of digital subtraction angiography in stereotactic treatment planning
    Treuer, H
    Hoevels, M
    Hunsche, S
    Landwehr, P
    Heindel, W
    Muller, RP
    Sturm, V
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XIITH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, 1997, : 245 - 247