Application of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Rock Fracture Toughness Mode-I and Mode-II

被引:17
作者
Meybodi, Enayatallah Emami [1 ]
Hussain, Syed Khaliq [1 ]
Marji, Mohammad Fatehi [2 ]
Rasouli, Vamegh [3 ]
机构
[1] Yazd Univ, Dept Geol, Yazd, Iran
[2] Yazd Univ, Dept Min & Met Engn, Yazd, Iran
[3] Univ North Dakota, Dept Petr Engn, Grand Forks, ND USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT | 2022年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
Intact rock; Macro- and micro-parameters; Machine learning method; Rock fracture toughness; CRACK-PROPAGATION; CONFINING PRESSURE; TEMPERATURE; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.22044/JME.2022.11596.2148
中图分类号
TD [矿业工程];
学科分类号
0819 ;
摘要
In this work, the machine learning prediction models are used in order to evaluate the influence of rock macro-parameters (uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength, and deformation modulus) on the rock fracture toughness related to the micro-parameters of rock. Four different types of machine learning methods, i.e. Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), Multivariate Non-Linear Regression (MNLR), copula method, and Support Vector Regression (SVR) are used in this work. The fracture toughness of mode I and mode II (KIC and KIIC) is selected as the dependent variable, whereas the tensile strength, compressive strength, and elastic modulus are considered as the independent variables, respectively. The data is collected from the literature. The results obtained show that the SVR model predicts the values of KIC and KIIC with the determination coefficients (R2) of 0.73 and 0.77. The corresponding determination coefficient values of the MLR model and the MNLR model for KI and KII are R2 = 0.63, R2 = 0.72, and R2 = 0.62, 0.75, respectively. The copula model predicts that the value of R2 for KI is 0.52, and for KII R2=0.69. K-fold cross-validation testing method performs for all these machine learning models. The cross-validation technique shows that SVR is the best-designed model for predicting the fracture toughness mode-I and mode-II.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 480
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Abdallah A, 2019, INT C INFORATMION TE, P383
[2]   Effects of number of freeze-thaw cycles and freezing temperature on mode I and mode II fracture toughness of cement mortar [J].
Abdolghanizadeh, K. ;
Hosseini, M. ;
Saghafiyazdi, M. .
JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 10 (04) :967-+
[3]   Comparison of fuzzy inference system (FIS), FIS with artificial neural networks (FIS plus ANN) and FIS with adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (FIS plus ANFIS) for inventory control [J].
Aengchuan, Prasert ;
Phruksaphanrat, Busaba .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2018, 29 (04) :905-923
[4]   Effects of confining pressure and temperature on mixed-mode (I-II) fracture toughness of a limestone rode [J].
Al-Shayea, NA ;
Khan, K ;
Abduljauwad, SN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2000, 37 (04) :629-643
[5]   Machine learning and RSM models for prediction of compressive strength of smart bio-concrete [J].
Algaifi, Hassan Amer ;
Abu Bakar, Suhaimi ;
Alyousef, Rayed ;
Sam, Abdul Rahman Mohd ;
Alqarni, Ali S. ;
Ibrahim, M. H. Wan ;
Shahidan, Shahiron ;
Ibrahim, Mohammed ;
Salami, Babatunde Abiodun .
SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2021, 28 (04) :535-551
[6]   Rock fracture toughness study using cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc specimen under pure modes I and II loading - A statistical approach [J].
Aliha, M. R. M. ;
Ayatollahi, M. R. .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2014, 69 :17-25
[7]  
Alimoradi A, 2013, J MIN ENVIRON, V4, P1
[8]  
Andersson J.C., 2007, SKB TR-07-01
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers
[10]   Effective 2D and 3D crack propagation with local mesh refinement and the screened Poisson equation [J].
Areias, P. ;
Reinoso, J. ;
Camanho, P. P. ;
Cesar de Sa, J. ;
Rabczuk, T. .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2018, 189 :339-360