A comparison of the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine, alone and in combination, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

被引:0
作者
Ratner, PH
van Bavel, JH
Martin, BG
Hampel, FC
Howland, WC
Rogenes, PR
Westlund, RE
Bowers, BW
Cook, CK
机构
[1] Sylvana Res, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Allergy Associates Austin, Diagnost Clin, Austin, TX USA
[3] HealthQuest Res, Austin, TX USA
[4] SW Allergy & Asthma Res Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Cent Texas Hlth Res, New Braunfels, TX USA
[6] Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
rhinitis; allergic; seasonal; loratadine; antihistamine; fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray [non-MeSH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Intranasal corticosteroids and oral antihistamines are both effective in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, although the therapeutic value of administering the two types of agents concurrently has rarely been evaluated. This study was designed to compare the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FP ANS), loratadine, FP ANS plus loratadine, and placebo (an aqueous nasal spray plus tablet) in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis during the mountain cedar allergy season in south central Texas. METHODS. Six hundred patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated for 2 weeks with either FP ANS 200 mu g once daily, loratadine 10 mg once daily, the FP ANS and loratadine regimens combined, or placebo in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. RESULTS. Clinician- and patient-rated total and individual nasal symptom scores after 7 and 14 days of therapy and overall evaluations were significantly lower (P <.001) in the FP ANS and FP ANS plus loratadine groups compared with the loratadine only and placebo groups. Loratadine was not statistically different from placebo in clinician and patient symptom score ratings nor in overall clinician and patient evaluations. FP ANS plus loratadine and FP ANS monotherapy were comparable in efficacy in almost all evaluations; for some patient-rated symptoms the combination was found superior. Mean score changes in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire from baseline to day 14 showed significantly greater improvement (P <.001) in quality of life in the FP ANS group than in the group of patients receiving loratadine only or placebo, and no significant benefit was demonstrated in the FP ANS plus loratadine group over the FP ANS monotherapy group. No serious or unusual drug-related adverse events were reported. Combining loratadine with FP ANS did not alter the adverse events profile or frequency. CONCLUSIONS. In the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, FP ANS is superior to loratadine and placebo, and adding loratadine to FP ANS does not confer meaningful additional benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 125
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE AQUEOUS NASAL SPRAY TAKEN ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH CETIRIZINE IN THE PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT OF SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS [J].
BENINCASA, C ;
LLOYD, RS .
DRUG INVESTIGATION, 1994, 8 (04) :225-233
[2]  
BOUSQUET J, 1987, 44 ANN C AM COLL ALL
[3]  
BOUSQUET J, 1994, ALLERGY, V94, P31
[4]   BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE .2. ALLERGIC RHINITIS AND OTHER CONDITIONS [J].
BROGDEN, RN ;
PINDER, RM ;
SAWYER, PR ;
SPEIGHT, TM ;
AVERY, GS .
DRUGS, 1975, 10 (03) :211-217
[5]   Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray compared with terfenadine tablets in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis [J].
Bronsky, EA ;
Dockhorn, RJ ;
Meltzer, EO ;
Shapiro, G ;
Boltansky, H ;
LaForce, C ;
Ransom, J ;
Weiler, JM ;
Blumenthal, M ;
Weakley, S ;
Wisniewski, M ;
Field, E ;
Rogenes, P .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 97 (04) :915-921
[6]  
COX FM, IN PRESS J MANAGED C
[7]   A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE AQUEOUS NASAL SPRAY, TERFENADINE TABLETS AND PLACEBO IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS TO GRASS-POLLEN [J].
DARNELL, R ;
PECOUD, A ;
RICHARDS, DH .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1994, 24 (12) :1144-1150
[8]  
DELCARPIO J, 1989, J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUN, V84, P741
[9]  
DROUIN MA, 1992, ALLERGY S, V12, P173
[10]   Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray compared with oral loratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis [J].
Gehanno, P ;
Desfougeres, JL .
ALLERGY, 1997, 52 (04) :445-450