Attitude filtering for nanosatellites: A comparison of different approaches under model uncertainties

被引:8
作者
Esit, Mehmet [1 ]
Yakupoglu, Sirin [1 ]
Soken, Halil Ersin [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Attitude filtering; Nanosatellite; QUEST; Monte Carlo simulations; MAGNETOMETER CALIBRATION; SMALL SATELLITES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2021.04.043
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Nanosatellites have become an integral part of space research in recent years, especially for universities and non-profit organizations. Attitude estimation is a key function that is playing a leading role in the success of their missions. Despite various research and several implemented algorithms, it is difficult to find comprehensive analyses on the attitude filtering algorithms used for nanosatellite attitude estimation. This article, first of all, presents different attitude filtering approaches that can be used for estimating the attitude of a nanosatellite. These approaches include the Multiplicative Extended Kalman Filter and Unscented Attitude Filter algorithms and their versions integrated with the QUEST algorithm that are pre-processing the vector measurements. Then the given filtering algorithms are evaluated with their different structures depending on the availability of gyro measurements; gyro-based filtering, gyroless filtering and dynamics-based filtering with gyro measurements. These evaluations are done with a realistic dynamics model that includes the dominating disturbance torques for a nanosatellite mission which are assumed unknown at the stage of attitude filtering. In the end, twelve different filtering algorithms are compared with Monte Carlo analyses. (C) 2021 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2551 / 2564
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, J AEROSPACE ENG SCI, DOI DOI 10.7446/JAESA.0202.05
[2]   Performance analysis of Fast Unscented Kalman Filters for Attitude Determination [J].
Biswas, Sanat K. ;
Southwell, Ben ;
Dempster, Andrew G. .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (01) :697-701
[3]   Online attitude determination of a passively magnetically stabilized spacecraft [J].
Burton, R. ;
Rock, S. ;
Springmann, J. ;
Cutler, J. .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2017, 133 :269-281
[4]   UWE-3, in-orbit performance and lessons learned of a modular and flexible satellite bus for future pico-satellite formations [J].
Busch, S. ;
Bangert, P. ;
Dombrovski, S. ;
Schilling, K. .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2015, 117 :73-89
[5]   A Simple Attitude Unscented Kalman Filter: Theory and Evaluation in a Magnetometer-Only Spacecraft Scenario [J].
Challa, Murty S. ;
Moore, Jay G. ;
Rogers, Daniel J. .
IEEE ACCESS, 2016, 4 :1845-1858
[6]   Improvement to the Implementation of the QUEST Algorithm [J].
Cheng, Yang ;
Shuster, Malcolm D. .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2014, 37 (01) :301-305
[7]   Unscented filtering for spacecraft attitude estimation [J].
Crassidis, JL ;
Markley, FL .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2003, 26 (04) :536-542
[8]  
de Oliveira GF, 2013, AEROSP CONF PROC
[9]   Nonlinear filtering for sequential spacecraft attitude estimation with real data: Cubature Kalman Filter, Unscented Kalman Filter and Extended Kalman Filter [J].
Garcia, R. V. ;
Pardal, P. C. P. M. ;
Kuga, H. K. ;
Zanardi, M. C. .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (02) :1038-1050
[10]   Some Relations Between Extended and Unscented Kalman Filters [J].
Gustafsson, Fredrik ;
Hendeby, Gustaf .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012, 60 (02) :545-555