Bio-SimVerb and Bio-SimLex: wide-coverage evaluation sets of word similarity in biomedicine

被引:12
作者
Chiu, Billy [1 ]
Pyysalo, Sampo [1 ]
Vulic, Ivan [1 ]
Korhonen, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Language Technol Lab, DTAL, 9 West Rd,CB39DB, Cambridge CB39DB, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Word similarity; Intrinsic evaluation; Downstream tasks; ONTOLOGIES; ANATOMY; REPRESENTATION; UNIFICATION; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-018-2039-z
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Word representations support a variety of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. The quality of these representations is typically assessed by comparing the distances in the induced vector spaces against human similarity judgements. Whereas comprehensive evaluation resources have recently been developed for the general domain, similar resources for biomedicine currently suffer from the lack of coverage, both in terms of word types included and with respect to the semantic distinctions. Notably, verbs have been excluded, although they are essential for the interpretation of biomedical language. Further, current resources do not discern between semantic similarity and semantic relatedness, although this has been proven as an important predictor of the usefulness of word representations and their performance in downstream applications. Results: We present two novel comprehensive resources targeting the evaluation of word representations in biomedicine. These resources, Bio-SimVerb and Bio-SimLex, address the previously mentioned problems, and can be used for evaluations of verb and noun representations respectively. In our experiments, we have computed the Pearson's correlation between performances on intrinsic and extrinsic tasks using twelve popular state-of-the-art representation models (e.g. word2vec models). The intrinsic-extrinsic correlations using our datasets are notably higher than with previous intrinsic evaluation benchmarks such as UMNSRS and MayoSRS. In addition, when evaluating representation models for their abilities to capture verb and noun semantics individually, we show a considerable variation between performances across all models. Conclusion: Bio-SimVerb and Bio-SimLex enable intrinsic evaluation of word representations. This evaluation can serve as a predictor of performance on various downstream tasks in the biomedical domain. The results on Bio-SimVerb and Bio-SimLex using standard word representation models highlight the importance of developing dedicated evaluation resources for NLP in biomedicine for particular word classes (e.g. verbs). These are needed to identify the most accurate methods for learning class-specific representations. Bio-SimVerb and Bio-SimLex are publicly available.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[61]   The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration [J].
Smith, Barry ;
Ashburner, Michael ;
Rosse, Cornelius ;
Bard, Jonathan ;
Bug, William ;
Ceusters, Werner ;
Goldberg, Louis J. ;
Eilbeck, Karen ;
Ireland, Amelia ;
Mungall, Christopher J. ;
Leontis, Neocles ;
Rocca-Serra, Philippe ;
Ruttenberg, Alan ;
Sansone, Susanna-Assunta ;
Scheuermann, Richard H. ;
Shah, Nigam ;
Whetzel, Patricia L. ;
Lewis, Suzanna .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 25 (11) :1251-1255
[62]  
Turian J, 2010, ACL 2010: 48TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, P384
[63]   Domain and Function: A Dual-Space Model of Semantic Relations and Compositions [J].
Turney, Peter D. .
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2012, 44 :533-585
[64]   The zebrafish anatomy and stage ontologies: representing the anatomy and development of Danio rerio [J].
Van Slyke, Ceri E. ;
Bradford, Yvonne M. ;
Westerfield, Monte ;
Haendel, Melissa A. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SEMANTICS, 2014, 5
[65]   ONTOLOGIES AS INTEGRATIVE TOOLS FOR PLANT SCIENCE [J].
Walls, Ramona L. ;
Athreya, Balaji ;
Cooper, Laurel ;
Elser, Justin ;
Gandolfo, Maria A. ;
Jaiswal, Pankaj ;
Mungall, Christopher J. ;
Preece, Justin ;
Rensing, Stefan ;
Smith, Barry ;
Stevenson, Dennis W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2012, 99 (08) :1263-1275
[66]  
Wieting J., 2015, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, V3, P345