Lymph node-positive prostate cancer: current issues, emerging technology and impact on clinical outcome

被引:1
作者
Adams, Julia [1 ]
Cheng, Liang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Urol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
cancer volume; dedifferentiation; metastasis; pelvic lymphadenectomy; prognosis; prostate; sentinel node; staging and classification; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; MICROVASCULAR INVASION; LYMPHOVASCULAR INVASION; EXTRANODAL EXTENSION; STAGE-D1; ADENOCARCINOMA; PTXN+ ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1586/ERA.11.104
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate cancer indicates a poorer prognosis compared with patients without lymph node metastasis; however, some patients with node-positive disease have long-term survival. Many studies have attempted to discern what characteristics of lymph node metastasis are prognostically significant. These characteristics include nodal tumor volume, number of positive lymph nodes, lymph node density, extranodal extension, lymphovascular invasion and tumor dedifferentiation. Favorable characteristics of regional lymph node involvement included a smaller tumor size and smaller tumor volume. However, the current staging system for prostate cancer does not provide different subclassifications for patients with node-positive prostate cancer. In recent years numerous advanced technologies for the detection of lymph node metastasis have been developed, including molecular imaging techniques and the CellSearch (R) Circulating Tumor Cell System. With the increased detection of patients with prostate cancer, emergence of new technology to identify lymph node metastasis and the number of radical prostatectomies being performed on the rise, subclassifying patients with lymph node-positive disease is imperative. Subclassification would provide a better picture of patient prognosis and allow for a better understanding of targeted therapies to treat patients with lymph node metastasis.
引用
收藏
页码:1457 / 1469
页数:13
相关论文
共 169 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF TUMOR PROGRESSION BY REPEATED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSIES IN PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA - MODAL DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC-ACID VALUE AND CYTOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION [J].
ADOLFSSON, J ;
TRIBUKAIT, B .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 144 (06) :1408-1410
[2]   Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: Impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Allaf, ME ;
Palapattu, GS ;
Trock, BJ ;
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (05) :1840-1844
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
[4]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF EXTENT OF NODAL INVOLVEMENT IN STAGE-D1 PROSTATE-CANCER TREATED WITH RADIOTHERAPY [J].
ANSCHER, MS ;
PROSNITZ, LR .
UROLOGY, 1992, 39 (01) :39-43
[5]  
AUSTENFELD MS, 1990, UROL CLIN N AM, V17, P867
[6]  
Babaian RJ, 2001, CANCER, V91, P1414
[7]   Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (02) :514-518
[8]   Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (03) :849-854
[9]   INCIDENCE AND PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF LYMPHATIC AND VASCULAR INVASION IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS [J].
BAHNSON, RR ;
DRESNER, SM ;
GOODING, W ;
BECICH, MJ .
PROSTATE, 1989, 15 (02) :149-155
[10]   The influence of lymph node counts on the detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer [J].
Barth, PJ ;
Gerharz, EW ;
Ramaswamy, A ;
Riedmiller, H .
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1999, 195 (09) :633-636