How social values have affected forest policy

被引:0
作者
Force, JE [1 ]
Fizzell, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Forest Resources, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS 1999 NATIONAL CONVENTION | 2000年
关键词
social values; public opinion; behavior; public judgment; forest policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Social values are difficult to define and measure. Social scientists define social values as desired end-states that go beyond self to address the concerns of the larger society; they are not necessarily values held by the majority of society. Two primary indicators of social values are public opinion and people's behavior. Forest policies reflect a range of social values. The challenge facing foresters is the disconnect between public opinion which supports increased environmental protection and reduced forest commodity production and people's behavior which demands an increased amount of forest products and services. We suggest that public judgment, which goes beyond public opinion and addresses taking responsibility for the consequences of one's behavior, merits consideration. Foresters have an important role to play in facilitating public judgments about our forest resources.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Forest Policy Reform in Brazil [J].
Bauch, Simone ;
Sills, Erin ;
Estraviz Rodriguez, Luiz Carlos ;
McGinley, Kathleen ;
Cubbage, Frederick .
JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2009, 107 (03) :132-138
[32]   Party over Pocketbook? How Party Cues Influence Opinion When Citizens Have a Stake in Policy [J].
Slothuus, Rune ;
Bisgaard, Martin .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 115 (03) :1090-1096
[33]   From altruistic to strategic CSR: how social value affected CSR development - a case study of Thailand [J].
Srisuphaolarn, Patnaree .
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2013, 9 (01) :56-+
[34]   How does social insurance policy affect citizens' political participation? An empirical research based on policy feedback theory [J].
Wang, Hongbo ;
Gong, Xi ;
Zhang, Kairan .
REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2025,
[35]   How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies [J].
de Groot, Judith I. M. ;
Schuitema, Geertje .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 19-20 :100-107
[36]   How many facets does a "social robot" have? A review of scientific and popular definitions online [J].
Sarrica, Mauro ;
Brondi, Sonia ;
Fortunati, Leopoldina .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2019, 33 (01) :1-21
[37]   Taking social policy personally: How does neuroticism affect welfare state attitudes? [J].
Tepe, Markus ;
Vanhuysse, Pieter .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 54 (05) :699-718
[38]   How Social Group Memberships Interact to Shape Partisanship, Policy Orientations, and Vote Choice [J].
Zingher, Joshua N. .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2023, 45 (02) :699-717
[39]   Health system values and social values of dental practitioners [J].
Brennan, David S. ;
Singh, Kiran A. ;
Spencer, A. John .
HEALTH POLICY, 2008, 86 (2-3) :318-324
[40]   Social Values among Young Generation. The Values System of the Future Social Workers [J].
Dumitrescu, O. .
RETHINKING SOCIAL ACTION. CORE VALUES, 2015, :497-500