Women's Preferences for Minimally Invasive Incisions

被引:42
作者
Bush, Amanda J. [1 ]
Morris, Stephanie N. [2 ]
Millham, Frederick H. [3 ]
Isaacson, Keith B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Amer Med Grp, Belvidere, IL 61008 USA
[2] Newton Wellesley Hosp, Ctr Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg, Newton, MA USA
[3] Newton Wellesley Hosp, Dept Surg, Newton, MA USA
关键词
Laparoscopy; Incisions; Single-site surgery; Robotics; Surgical procedures; Minimally invasive; Aesthetics; Survey; Choice behavior; Adult; Middle aged; Female; Humans; HYSTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To determine whether traditional, robotic, or single-site laparoscopic incisions are more appealing to women. Design: Descriptive study using a survey (Canadian Task Force classification III). Setting: Single-specialty referral-based gynecology practice. Patients: All patients older than 18 years who came for care to the Newton-Wellesley Hospital Minimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery Center from April 2, 2010, to June 30, 2010. Interventions: Three identical photos of an unscarred female abdomen were each marked with a black pen to indicate typical incision lengths and locations for robotic, single-site, and traditional laparoscopic surgery. Subjects were then asked to rank these incisions in order of preference. Additional demographic and surgical history questions were included in the survey. Measurements and Main Results: Two-hundred fifty of 427 patients (58.5%) returned surveys, and of these, 241 completed critical survey elements. Preference for traditional laparoscopic incisions was 56.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.1%-62.7%), for a single incision was 41.1% (95% CI, 34.8%-47.3%), and for robotic surgery was 2.5% (95% CI, 0.5%-4.5%). Two-sample test of proportion (Z test) showed the difference in preference for traditional over the other methods to be significant: p = .007 for a single incision and p <.001 for robotic surgery. Multivariatble analysis for factors influencing choice of single-site incision demonstrated that Latina/Hispanic ethnicity was the only significant factor (p = .02). Conclusion: Women prefer both single-site and traditional laparoscopic incisions over robotic procedures. Inasmuch as aesthetics are an important consideration for many women and clinical outcomes are similar, during the informed-consent procedure, location and length of incisions should be included in the discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2011) 18, 640 643 (C) 2011 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 643
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [2] A comparative study of the cosmetic appeal of abdominal incisions used for hysterectomy
    Currie, I
    Onwude, JL
    Jarvis, GJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (03): : 252 - 254
  • [3] Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot
    Diaz-Arrastia, C
    Jurnalov, C
    Gomez, G
    Townsend, C
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (09): : 1271 - 1273
  • [4] Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: Technique and initial report
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    Escobar, Pedro F.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (02) : 157 - 161
  • [5] Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    Lee, Yoo-Young
    Cha, Hyun Hwa
    Kim, Chul-Jung
    Choi, Chel Hun
    Lee, Jeong-Won
    Bae, Duk-Soo
    Lee, Je-ho
    Kim, Byoung-Gie
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (09): : 2248 - 2252
  • [6] Nieboer TE, 2009, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4, 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5]
  • [7] LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY
    REICH, H
    DECAPRIO, J
    MCGLYNN, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 1989, 5 (02) : 213 - 216
  • [8] Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study
    Sarlos, Dimitri
    Kots, LaVonne
    Stevanovic, Nebojsa
    Schaer, Gabriel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 150 (01) : 92 - 96