PCAOB guidance and audits of fair values for Level 2 investments

被引:7
作者
Emett, Scott A. [1 ]
Libby, Robert [2 ]
Nelson, Mark W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Cornell Coll Business, Johnson Grad Sch Management, Sage Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
Fair value accounting; Audit adjustments; Management bias; PCAOB guidance; PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM; JUDGMENT; UNCERTAINTY; FREQUENCY; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.011
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Investments that are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy account for approximately 92 percent of US banks' fair value assets. We report an experiment that examines how experienced auditors apply current PCAOB guidance when auditing portfolios of these assets. We hypothesize and find that, depending on how overstatement is distributed within a portfolio, current PCAOB guidance leads auditors to make adjustments that are predictably larger or smaller than the aggregate overstatement in the portfolio. Auditors are more likely to follow PCAOB guidance when doing so leads to lower audit adjustments and higher client income. We also predict and find that auditors identify some patterns of overstatement as indicative of management bias, but not others. However, management-bias assessments do not affect auditors' adjustment decisions as standards imply they should, even when auditors are prompted to consider management bias. Together, these results highlight a potential deficiency in current auditing guidance that managers could exploit by strategically locating overstatements within securities with larger book values or by spreading those overstatements across many securities within a portfolio. We suggest changes to current PCAOB guidance which may reduce these effects. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 72
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   THE INFLUENCE OF PRIOR BELIEFS, FREQUENCY CUES, AND MAGNITUDE CUES ON CONSUMERS PERCEPTIONS OF COMPARATIVE PRICE DATA [J].
ALBA, JW ;
BRONIARCZYK, SM ;
SHIMP, TA ;
URBANY, JE .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (02) :219-235
[2]   The effect of discount frequency and depth on consumer price judgments [J].
Alba, JW ;
Mela, CF ;
Shimp, TA ;
Urbany, JE .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1999, 26 (02) :99-114
[3]  
[Anonymous], ACCOUNTING REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, AUD ACC EST INCL FAI
[5]  
[Anonymous], WORKING PAPER
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, WORKING PAPER
[7]   Representing the market perspective: Fair value measurement for non-financial assets [J].
Barker, Richard ;
Schulte, Sebastian .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2017, 56 :55-67
[8]  
Barth M.E., 2006, Accounting Horizons, V20, P271
[9]   Commentary on Auditing High-Uncertainty Fair Value Estimates [J].
Bell, Timothy B. ;
Griffin, Jeremy B. .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2012, 31 (01) :147-155
[10]   Risk-Based Auditing, Strategic Prompts, and Auditor Sensitivity to the Strategic Risk of Fraud [J].
Bowlin, Kendall .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 86 (04) :1231-1253