Opportunities and challenges for current developmental neuroscience

被引:1
作者
Steinbeis, Nikolaus [1 ]
Margulies, Daniel S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Brain & Dev Lab, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Neuroanat & Connect Res Grp, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
cognitive neuroscience; connectome; developmental continuity; developmental psychology; theory of mind development; TEMPORO-PARIETAL JUNCTION; FALSE BELIEF; MIND; INFANTS; METAANALYSIS; REPRESENTATION; ATTRIBUTION; CONTINUITY; COGNITION; SENSE;
D O I
10.1177/0959354316662158
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
While developmental neuroscience can often be motivated by clinical and policy concerns, its constituent research methodologies aim to provide insights into the limits and potential of the developing brain. Our article addresses two main approaches for characterizing psychological and neural changes that occur between infancy and adolescence. Specifically, with respect to psychological change, intensely debated topics such as the nature of developmental continuity can potentially gain from the insights provided by brain data. Whereas for neuroimaging approaches, which have gained substantial traction in recent years, the advances in describing the developing connectome have been challenged by awareness of imaging artefacts related to behavioural aspects of development (such as motion). As these two fields (developmental psychology and neuroscience) continue to integrate by, for example, constraining psychological hypotheses with brain data and offering explanatory models of neuroimaging findings, the resolution of these challenges charts the development of the field itself.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 631
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1971, Biology and Knowledge
  • [2] [Anonymous], CONCEPT DEV
  • [3] Developmental Continuity in Theory of Mind: Speed and Accuracy of Belief-Desire Reasoning in Children and Adults
    Apperly, Ian A.
    Warren, Frances
    Andrews, Benjamin J.
    Grant, Jay
    Todd, Sophie
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 82 (05) : 1691 - 1703
  • [4] Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States?
    Apperly, Ian A.
    Butterfill, Stephen A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 116 (04) : 953 - 970
  • [5] Berk LauraE., 2012, CHILD DEV
  • [6] Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind
    Bloom, P
    German, TP
    [J]. COGNITION, 2000, 77 (01) : B25 - B31
  • [7] Bowlby John, 1969, Attachment and loss: Vol. I: Attachment
  • [8] ADHD-200 Global Competition: diagnosing ADHD using personal characteristic data can outperform resting state fMRI measurements
    Brown, Matthew R. G.
    Sidhu, Gagan S.
    Greiner, Russell
    Asgarian, Nasimeh
    Bastani, Meysam
    Silverstone, Peter H.
    Greenshaw, Andrew J.
    Dursun, Serdar M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6 : 1 - 22
  • [9] Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
    Bullmore, Edward T.
    Sporns, Olaf
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 10 (03) : 186 - 198
  • [10] Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy
    Bzdok, Danilo
    Schilbach, Leonhard
    Vogeley, Kai
    Schneider, Karla
    Laird, Angela R.
    Langner, Robert
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    [J]. BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION, 2012, 217 (04) : 783 - 796