Umbilical venous diameter and flow in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: association with placental sharing and fetal demise

被引:4
作者
Couck, I [1 ]
van der Merwe, J. [1 ]
Russo, F. [1 ]
Richter, J. [1 ,2 ]
Aertsen, M. [3 ,4 ]
Cauwberghs, B. [5 ]
Van Aelst, M. [5 ]
Lewi, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Biomed Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Imaging & Pathol, Biomed Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
fetal demise; monochorionic twin pregnancy; placenta; prenatal ultrasound; BIRTH-WEIGHT; VOLUME FLOW; GROWTH; DISCORDANCE;
D O I
10.1002/uog.24903
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To examine the association of umbilical venous diameter and flow in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy with placental sharing and fetal demise. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of a consecutive series of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies that underwent ultrasound assessments at 12, 16, 20 and 28 weeks' gestation. Fetal biometry (crown-rump length at 12 weeks or estimated fetal weight (EFW) thereafter) and cord insertion sites were recorded at each visit, as well as the diameter of the umbilical vein (UV) in both the intra-abdominal part and a free loop of the umbilical cord. Time-averaged maximum velocity in the intra-abdominal part of the UV was measured to calculate UV-flow. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between intertwin ratios of these variables and placental sharing at 12, 16, 20 and 28 weeks' gestation. Placental sharing was calculated by dividing the larger by the smaller placental share, as measured on placental injection studies after birth. Additionally, the Mann-Whitney U-test and receiver-operating-characteristics-curve analysis were used to explore the relationship between the occurrence of fetal demise and intertwin differences in fetal biometry, cord insertion sites, UV diameters and flow at 12, 16, 20 and 28 weeks. Results Of 200 consecutive monochorionic twin pregnancies enrolled, injection studies were performed in 165 (82.5%) placentas. On univariate analysis, intertwin differences in fetal biometry, cord insertions and UV variables were associated significantly with placental sharing at 12, 16, 20 and 28 weeks' gestation. On multivariate analysis, intertwin differences in fetal biometry, cord insertions and all three UV variables remained associated significantly with placental sharing at 12 and 16 weeks. However, at 20 and 28 weeks, only the intertwin EFW ratio was associated consistently with placental sharing. Fetal demise of one or both twins complicated 26 (13.0%) pregnancies. Differences in EFW and cord insertion sites were not associated significantly with fetal demise, while at 16 weeks, differences in intra-abdominal UV diameter and flow were associated with an increased risk of subsequent fetal demise. Conclusions At 12 and 16 weeks' gestation, intertwin differences in UV diameter and flow reflect placental sharing more accurately than do differences in fetal growth and cord insertion sites. At 16 weeks, discordance in intra-abdominal UV diameter and flow is also associated with an increased risk of fetal demise. (c) 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 522
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Discordance of cord insertions as a predictor of discordant fetal growth in monochorionic twins [J].
Cambiaso, Olivia ;
Zhao, De-Peng ;
Abasolo, Jose I. ;
Aiello, Horacio A. ;
Oepkes, Dick ;
Lopriore, Enrico ;
Otano, Lucas .
PLACENTA, 2016, 47 :81-85
[2]   The Relationships of Umbilical Venous Volume Flow, Birthweight and Placental Share in Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies With and Without Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction [J].
Chang, Yao-lung ;
Chang, Shuenn-dyh ;
Chao, An-shine ;
Wang, Chao-nin ;
Wang, Tzu-hao ;
Cheng, Po-jen .
TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2011, 14 (02) :192-197
[3]   Fetal growth after laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome [J].
Chmait, Ramen H. ;
Korst, Lisa M. ;
Bornick, Patricia W. ;
Allen, Mary H. ;
Quintero, Ruben A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (01) :47.e1-47.e6
[4]   The vascular equator in monochorionic twin placentas [J].
Couck, I ;
Jespers, A. ;
Deprest, J. ;
Lewi, L. .
PLACENTA, 2020, 99 :193-196
[5]   Outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy with selective fetal growth restriction at 16, 20 or 30 weeks according to new Delphi consensus definition [J].
Couck, I. ;
Ponnet, S. ;
Deprest, J. ;
Devlieger, R. ;
De Catte, L. ;
Lewi, L. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 56 (06) :821-830
[6]   The assessment of placental sharing using X-ray angiogram versus digital photograph: A prospective study [J].
Couck, Isabel ;
Aertsen, Michael ;
Jespers, Astrid ;
Deneckere, Sanne ;
Lewi, Liesbeth .
PLACENTA, 2019, 83 :1-4
[7]   Placental angioarchitecture in monochorionic twin pregnancies: Relationship to fetal growth, fetofetal transfusion syndrome, and pregnancy outcome [J].
Denbow, ML ;
Cox, P ;
Taylor, M ;
Hammal, DM ;
Fisk, NM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (02) :417-426
[8]   Unequal placental sharing and birth weight discordance in monochorionic diamniotic twins [J].
Fick, Andrea L. ;
Feldstein, Vickie A. ;
Norton, Mary E. ;
Fyr, Christina Wasset ;
Caughey, Aaron B. ;
Machin, Geoffrey A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (01) :178-183
[9]   Umbilical venous blood flow measurement:: accuracy and reproducibility [J].
Figueras, F. ;
Fernandez, S. ;
Hernandez-Andrade, E. ;
Gratacos, E. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 32 (04) :587-591
[10]   A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin [J].
Gratacos, E. ;
Lewi, L. ;
Munoz, B. ;
Acosta-Rojas, R. ;
Hernandez-Andrade, E. ;
Martinez, J. M. ;
Carreras, E. ;
Deprest, J. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 30 (01) :28-34