Flood Forecasting and Inundation Mapping Using HiResFlood-UCI and Near-Real-Time Satellite Precipitation Data: The 2008 Iowa Flood

被引:57
作者
Phu Nguyen [1 ]
Thorstensen, Andrea [1 ]
Sorooshian, Soroosh [1 ]
Hsu, Kuolin [1 ]
AghaKouchak, Amir [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Irvine, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SYSTEM; HYDROLOGY; RIVER;
D O I
10.1175/JHM-D-14-0212.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Floods are among the most devastating natural hazards in society. Flood forecasting is crucially important in order to provide warnings in time to protect people and properties from such disasters. This research applied the high-resolution coupled hydrologic-hydraulic model from the University of California, Irvine, named HiResFlood-UCI, to simulate the historical 2008 Iowa flood. HiResFlood-UCI was forced with the near-real-time Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks-Cloud Classification System (PERSIANN-CCS) and NEXRAD Stage 2 precipitation data. The model was run using the a priori hydrologic parameters and hydraulic Manning n values from lookup tables. The model results were evaluated in two aspects: point comparison using USGS streamflow and areal validation of inundation maps using USDA's flood extent maps derived from Advanced Wide Field Sensor (AWiFS) 56-m resolution imagery. The results show that the PERSIANN-CCS simulation tends to capture the observed hydrograph shape better than Stage 2 (minimum correlation of 0.86 for PERSIANN-CCS and 0.72 for Stage 2); however, at most of the stream gauges, Stage 2 simulation provides more accurate estimates of flood peaks compared to PERSIANN-CCS (49%-90% bias reduction from PERSIANN-CCS to Stage 2). The simulation in both cases shows a good agreement (0.67 and 0.73 critical success index for Stage 2 and PERSIANN-CCS simulations, respectively) with the AWiFS flood extent. Since the PERSIANN-CCS simulation slightly underestimated the discharge, the probability of detection (0.93) is slightly lower than that of the Stage 2 simulation (0.97). As a trade-off, the false alarm rate for the PERSIANN-CCS simulation (0.23) is better than that of the Stage 2 simulation (0.31).
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1183
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Evaluation of satellite-retrieved extreme precipitation rates across the central United States [J].
AghaKouchak, A. ;
Behrangi, A. ;
Sorooshian, S. ;
Hsu, K. ;
Amitai, E. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2011, 116
[2]   Systematic and random error components in satellite precipitation data sets [J].
AghaKouchak, Amir ;
Mehran, Ali ;
Norouzi, Hamidreza ;
Behrangi, Ali .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39
[3]   Measuring surface water from space [J].
Alsdorf, Douglas E. ;
Rodriguez, Ernesto ;
Lettenmaier, Dennis P. .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 45 (02)
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT RESOURCESAT LISS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 20101190 USGS
[6]  
[Anonymous], CSDMS ANN M 2013 BOU
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, SCI COLD ARID REG
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012 FALL M SAN FRAN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1959, OPEN CHANNEL HYDRAUL
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, MAN FLOOD FOR WARN