Management and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer - A national population-based study

被引:60
作者
Westberg, Karin [1 ]
Palmer, Gabriella [2 ]
Hjern, Fredrik [3 ]
Johansson, Hemming [4 ]
Holm, Torbjorn [2 ]
Martling, Anna [2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Hosp, Div Surg, Dept Mol Med & Surg, S-18288 Danderyd, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Ctr Digest Dis, Dept Mol Med & Surg, P9 03, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Hosp, Dept Clin Sci, Div Surg, S-18288 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Deparanent Oncol Pathol, K7,Z4 01, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
EJSO | 2018年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Local recurrence; Treatment; Treatment intention; Prognosis; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; COMPLICATIONS; RESECTION; VALIDITY; PATTERNS; REGISTRY; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The rate of local recurrence of rectal cancer (LRRC) has decreased but the condition remains a therapeutic challenge. This study aimed to examine treatment and prognosis in patients with LRRC in Sweden. Special focus was directed towards potential differences between geographical regions and time periods. Method: All patients with LRRC as first event, following primary surgery for rectal cancer performed during the period 1995-2002, were included in this national population-based cohort-study. Data were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and from medical records. The cohort was divided into three time periods, based on the date of diagnosis of the LRRC. Results: In total, 426 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Treatment with curative intent was performed in 149 patients (35%), including 121 patients who had a surgical resection of the LRRC. R0-resection was achieved in 64 patients (53%). Patients with a non-centrally located tumour were more likely to have positive resection margins (R1/R2) (OR 5.02, 95% CL2.25-11.21). Five-year survival for patients resected with curative intent was 43% after R0-resection and 14% after R1-resection. There were no significant differences in treatment intention or R0-resection rate between time periods or regions. The risk of any failure was significantly higher in R1-resected patients compared with R0-resected patients (HR 2.04, 95% CI:1.22-3.40). Conclusion: A complete resection of the LRRC is essential for potentially curative treatment. Time period and region had no influence on either margin status or prognosis. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 107
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Management of recurrent rectal cancer: A population based study in greater Amsterdam [J].
Bakx, Roel ;
Visser, Otto ;
Josso, Judith ;
Meijer, Sybren ;
Slors, J. Frederik M. ;
Van Lanschot, J. Jan B. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 14 (39) :6018-6023
[2]   Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes [J].
Bhangu, A. ;
Beynon, J. ;
Brown, G. ;
Chang, G. ;
Das, P. ;
Desai, A. ;
Frizelle, F. ;
Glynne-Jones, R. ;
Goldin, R. ;
Hawkins, M. A. ;
Heriot, A. ;
Laurberg, S. ;
Mirnezami, A. ;
Nicholls, R. J. ;
Sagar, P. ;
Tekkis, P. ;
Vuong, T. ;
Wilson, M. ;
Ali, S. M. ;
Antoniou, A. ;
Bose, P. ;
Boyle, K. ;
Branagan, G. ;
Burling, D. ;
Clark, S. K. ;
Colquhoun, P. ;
Crane, C. H. ;
Darzi, A. ;
Davies, M. ;
Delaney, C. P. ;
Dietz, D. ;
Dozois, E. J. ;
Duff, M. ;
Dziki, A. ;
Faria, J. ;
Fitzgerald, J. E. ;
Georgiou, P. ;
George, B. ;
George, M. L. ;
Gupta, A. ;
Guy, R. ;
Harji, D. P. ;
Harris, D. A. ;
Herzig, D. ;
Holm, T. ;
Hompes, R. ;
Jeys, L. ;
Jenkins, J. T. ;
Kiran, R. P. ;
Koh, C. E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (08) :E1-E33
[3]   Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer [J].
Boyle, KM ;
Sagar, PM ;
Chalmers, AG ;
Sebag-Montefiore, D ;
Cairns, A ;
Eardley, I .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (05) :929-937
[4]   Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery [J].
Gunnarsson, U ;
Seligsohn, E ;
Jestin, P ;
Påhlman, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (04) :454-459
[5]   Time trends in the treatment and survival of recurrences from colorectal cancer [J].
Guyot, F ;
Faivre, J ;
Manfredi, S ;
Meny, B ;
Bonithon-Kopp, C ;
Bouvier, AM .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (05) :756-761
[6]   Locally recurrent rectal cancer in Norway [J].
Hansen, M. H. ;
Balteskard, L. ;
Dorum, L. M. ;
Eriksen, M. T. ;
Voenn, B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (10) :1176-1182
[7]   Systematic review of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration [J].
Harji, D. P. ;
Griffiths, B. ;
Velikova, G. ;
Sagar, P. M. ;
Brown, J. .
EJSO, 2016, 42 (08) :1132-1145
[8]   The Outcomes and Patterns of Treatment Failure After Surgery for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer [J].
Harris, Craig A. ;
Solomon, Michael J. ;
Heriot, Alexander G. ;
Sagar, Peter M. ;
Tekkis, Paris P. ;
Dixon, Liane ;
Pascoe, Rebecca ;
Dobbs, Bruce R. ;
Frampton, Chris M. ;
Harji, Deena P. ;
Kontovounisios, Christos ;
Austin, Kirk K. ;
Koh, Cherry E. ;
Lee, Peter J. ;
Lynch, Andrew C. ;
Warrier, Satish K. ;
Frizelle, Frank A. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 264 (02) :323-329
[9]   Validity of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry for patients treated with major abdominal surgery between 1995 and 1997 [J].
Jorgren, Fredrik ;
Johansson, Robert ;
Damber, Lena ;
Lindmark, Gudrun .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (08) :1707-1714
[10]   Impact of Anatomic Location on Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Superior Outcome for Intraluminal Tumour Recurrence [J].
Klose, Johannes ;
Tarantino, Ignazio ;
Schmidt, Thomas ;
Bruckner, Thomas ;
Kulu, Yakup ;
Wagner, Tobias ;
Schneider, Martin ;
Buechler, Markus W. ;
Ulrich, Alexis .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (06) :1123-1131