Tillage, crop rotation, residue management and biochar influence on soil chemical and biological properties

被引:4
作者
Nyambo, Patrick [1 ]
Thengeni, B. [2 ]
Chiduza, Cornelius [2 ]
Araya, Tesfay [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ft Hare, Risk & Vulnerabil Sci Ctr, Alice, South Africa
[2] Univ Ft Hare, Dept Agron, Alice, South Africa
关键词
conservation agriculture; soil fertility; smallholder farmer; factorial design; split-split-plot; EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; ORGANIC-CARBON; FERTILIZER; NUTRIENTS; AMENDMENT; NITROGEN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/02571862.2021.1962421
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Soil and crop productivity cannot be maintained unless declining soil fertility is replenished. A three-year factorial experiment using a split-split-plot design, replicated three times, was used to evaluate the response of pH, electrical conductivity, exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, K and Na), microbial biomass carbon, total nitrogen and total carbon to conservation agriculture in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. The whole plot factors were conservation tillage and no tillage, the sub-plot factors three crop rotation practices (i.e. maize -> oat -> maize; maize -> vetch -> maize and maize -> fallow -> maize) and the sub-sub-plot factors three residue management practices (viz. residue retention; residue removal and biochar amendment). Soil pH and EC were not affected (p > 0.05) by these agricultural practices after 3 years. Magnesium (p < 0.05) and potassium (p < 0.01) were significantly affected by tillage at 0-5 cm depth. The tillage x crop rotation x residue management interaction was only significant (p < 0.01) for MBC at a depth of 0-5 cm depth. Interactions of tillage x crop rotation (p < 0.001) and crop rotation x residue management (p < 0.0001) were also significant. After three years, conservation agriculture resulted in net increases in total carbon, total nitrogen and MBC concentrations compared to conventional agricultural practices.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 397
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Agriculture Laboratory Association of Southern Africa (AgriLASA), 2004, SOIL HDB
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, SACRED AFRICA NAIROB
  • [3] Chimonyo V. G. P., 2019, S Afr. Jnl. Agric. Ext., V47, P103, DOI 10.17159/2413-3221/2019/v47n1a493
  • [4] Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries [DAFF], 2017, PROF S AFR MAIZ MARK
  • [5] Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen as affected by tillage and residue management under wheat-maize cropping system in the North China Plain
    Dikgwatlhe, Shadrack Batsile
    Chen, Zhong-Du
    Lal, Rattan
    Zhang, Hai-Lin
    Chen, Fu
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2014, 144 : 110 - 118
  • [6] Dube E., 2012, South African Journal of Plant and Soil, V29, P195, DOI 10.1080/02571862.2012.730637
  • [7] Dube E, 2010, THESIS U FORT HARE S
  • [8] Dube Ernest, 2013, South African Journal of Plant and Soil, V30, P227, DOI 10.1080/02571862.2013.867458
  • [9] Characterisation of livestock biochars and their effect on selected soil properties and maize early growth stage in soils of Eastern Cape province, South Africa
    Dzvene, Admire R.
    Chiduza, Cornelius
    Mnkeni, Pearson N. S.
    Peter, Prince C.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PLANT AND SOIL, 2019, 36 (03) : 199 - 209
  • [10] Soil-profile distribution of primary and secondary plant-available nutrients under conventional and no tillage
    Franzluebbers, AJ
    Hons, FM
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1996, 39 (3-4) : 229 - 239