Travel time unreliability on freeways: Why measures based on variance tell only half the story

被引:202
作者
van Lint, J. W. C. [1 ]
van Zuylen, Henk J. [1 ]
Tu, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Dept Transport & Planning, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
travel time reliability; travel time reliability maps; travel time reliability measures; travel time reliability monitoring;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2007.08.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In recent years, travel time reliability has become one of the key performance indicators of transportation networks and corridors around the globe. Travel time reliability indicators are mostly related to properties of the day-to-day travel time distribution on for example a freeway corridor. On the basis of empirical data a number of key characteristics of this day-to-day distribution can be identified. Most importantly, this distribution is not only very wide but also heavily skewed. The (economic) consequences of this skew are substantial. For example, it is shown that in some peak periods the 5% most "unlucky drivers" incur almost five times as much delay as the 50% most fortunate travelers. We argue this implies first of all that (besides the variance of travel times) skew must be considered an important contributing factor to travel time unreliability. Secondly, it suggests that most of currently used unreliability measures (which are predominantly based on travel time variance), should be used and interpreted with some reservations, since they only account for a part of the costs (that is, delays) of unreliability. This is further substantiated by a comparison on the basis of empirical data from a densely used freeway in the Netherlands between a new travel time reliability measure based on both width and skew, and a number of travel time reliability measures commonly used in practice. The analysis clearly illustrates the inconsistency between all measures, both old and new. In illustration, in cases where the commonly used misery index dubs a particular departure period very unreliable, another common measure (buffer time) considers these periods relatively reliable. Although without objective and quantitative criteria (e.g. economic or societal costs) a choice for any of these measures in road network performance analyses will remain subject to debate, this article provides empirically underpinned arguments to prefer measures incorporating the skew of the travel time distribution. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 277
页数:20
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HIGHW CAP MAN 2000
[2]  
ASAKURA Y, 1996, P 4 M EURO WORK GROU
[3]  
*AVV, 2004, NOT MOB
[4]   The valuation of reliability for personal travel [J].
Bates, J ;
Polak, J ;
Jones, P ;
Cook, A .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2001, 37 (2-3) :191-229
[5]  
BATES J, 2001, TRAVEL BEHAV RES LEA
[6]  
Bell M. G. H., 2000, Reliability of transport networks
[7]  
Belliveau JW, 1999, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V33, P35
[8]  
BOGERS EAI, 2004, P EUR TRANSP C STRAS
[9]   Joint modeling of advanced travel information service, habit, and learning impacts on route choice by laboratory simulator experiments [J].
Bogers, Enide A. I. ;
Viti, Francesco ;
Hoogendoorn, Serge P. .
TRAVELER BEHAVIOR AND VALUES 2005, 2005, (1926) :189-197
[10]   Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations [J].
Brownstone, D ;
Small, KA .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 39 (04) :279-293