Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Colon Cancer Treatment Accessibility and Survival in Toronto, Ontario, and San Francisco, California, 1996-2006

被引:49
作者
Gorey, Kevin M. [1 ]
Luginaah, Isaac N. [3 ]
Bartfay, Emma [4 ]
Fung, Karen Y. [2 ]
Holowaty, Eric J. [5 ]
Wright, Frances C. [6 ,7 ]
Hamm, Caroline [8 ]
Kanjeekal, Sindu M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Sch Social Work, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[2] Univ Windsor, Dept Math & Stat, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Geog, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[4] Univ Ontario, Inst Technol, Fac Hlth Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[5] Canc Care Ontario, Populat Studies & Surveillance, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[8] Windsor Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Windsor, ON, Canada
关键词
LYMPH-NODE EVALUATION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; HEALTH-INSURANCE; UNITED-STATES; DISPARITIES; ASSOCIATION; STAGE; CANADA;
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2009.173112
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. We examined the differential effects of socioeconomic status on colon cancer care and survival in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and San Francisco, California. Methods. We analyzed registry data for colon cancer patients from Ontario (n=930) and California (n=1014), diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2006, on stage, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival. We obtained socioeconomic data for individuals' residences from population censuses. Results. Income was directly associated with lymph node evaluation, chemotherapy, and survival in San Francisco but not in Toronto. High-income persons had better survival rates in San Francisco than in Toronto. After adjustment for stage, survival was better for low-income residents of Toronto than for those of San Francisco. Middle- to low-income patients were more likely to receive indicated chemotherapy in Toronto than in San Francisco. Conclusions. Socioeconomic factors appear to mediate colon cancer care in urban areas of the United States but not in Canada. Improvements are needed in screening, diagnostic investigations, and treatment access among low-income Americans. (Am J Public Health. 2011;101:112-119. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.173112)
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
[51]  
MANTEL N, 1959, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V22, P719
[52]   Cancer survival in Kentucky and health insurance coverage [J].
McDavid, K ;
Tucker, TC ;
Sloggett, A ;
Coleman, MP .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (18) :2135-2144
[53]   ESTIMABILITY AND ESTIMATION IN CASE-REFERENT STUDIES [J].
MIETTINEN, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1976, 103 (02) :226-235
[54]  
*N AM ASS CENTR CA, 2008, DAT QUAL ASS
[55]  
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, PURCH POW PAR
[56]   Poverty in Canada and the United States: measurement, trends, and implications [J].
Osberg, L .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2000, 33 (04) :847-877
[57]  
Polednak AP, 2001, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V12, P302
[58]   A population-based estimate of the extent of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario [J].
Rabeneck, L ;
Paszat, LF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (06) :1141-1144
[59]   Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes [J].
Roetzheim, RG ;
Pal, N ;
Gonzalez, EC ;
Ferrante, JM ;
Van Durme, DJ ;
Krischer, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 90 (11) :1746-1754
[60]   Race, socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis for five common malignancies [J].
Schwartz, KL ;
Crossley-May, H ;
Vigneau, FD ;
Brown, K ;
Banerjee, M .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2003, 14 (08) :761-766