Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Colon Cancer Treatment Accessibility and Survival in Toronto, Ontario, and San Francisco, California, 1996-2006

被引:49
作者
Gorey, Kevin M. [1 ]
Luginaah, Isaac N. [3 ]
Bartfay, Emma [4 ]
Fung, Karen Y. [2 ]
Holowaty, Eric J. [5 ]
Wright, Frances C. [6 ,7 ]
Hamm, Caroline [8 ]
Kanjeekal, Sindu M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Sch Social Work, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[2] Univ Windsor, Dept Math & Stat, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Geog, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[4] Univ Ontario, Inst Technol, Fac Hlth Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[5] Canc Care Ontario, Populat Studies & Surveillance, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[8] Windsor Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Windsor, ON, Canada
关键词
LYMPH-NODE EVALUATION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; HEALTH-INSURANCE; UNITED-STATES; DISPARITIES; ASSOCIATION; STAGE; CANADA;
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2009.173112
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. We examined the differential effects of socioeconomic status on colon cancer care and survival in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and San Francisco, California. Methods. We analyzed registry data for colon cancer patients from Ontario (n=930) and California (n=1014), diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2006, on stage, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival. We obtained socioeconomic data for individuals' residences from population censuses. Results. Income was directly associated with lymph node evaluation, chemotherapy, and survival in San Francisco but not in Toronto. High-income persons had better survival rates in San Francisco than in Toronto. After adjustment for stage, survival was better for low-income residents of Toronto than for those of San Francisco. Middle- to low-income patients were more likely to receive indicated chemotherapy in Toronto than in San Francisco. Conclusions. Socioeconomic factors appear to mediate colon cancer care in urban areas of the United States but not in Canada. Improvements are needed in screening, diagnostic investigations, and treatment access among low-income Americans. (Am J Public Health. 2011;101:112-119. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.173112)
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2006
[2]  
[Anonymous], SEER EXTENT DIS CODE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, INT CLASS DIS, V9th
[4]   Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: A national hospital report card [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Russell, Thomas R. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (18) :1310-1317
[5]   Associations between community income and cancer survival in Ontario, Canada, and the United States [J].
Boyd, C ;
Zhang-Salomons, JY ;
Groome, PA ;
Mackillop, WJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (07) :2244-2255
[6]   Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection in elderly Medicare and Medicaid patients with colon cancer [J].
Bradley, Cathy J. ;
Given, Charles W. ;
Dahman, Bassam ;
Fitzgerald, Timothy L. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (05) :521-529
[7]   Late stage cancers in a Medicaid-insured population [J].
Bradley, CJ ;
Given, CW ;
Roberts, C .
MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (06) :722-728
[8]  
Bradley CJ, 2001, CANCER, V91, P178, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<178::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-S
[10]   Prospective evaluation of screening colonoscopy: who is being screened? [J].
Bressler, B ;
Lo, C ;
Amar, J ;
Whittaker, S ;
Chaun, H ;
Halparin, L ;
Enns, R .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (06) :921-926