Patient-Centered Risk Assessment in Implant Treatment Planning

被引:23
作者
Curtis, Donald A. [1 ]
Lin, Guo-Hao [1 ]
Fishman, Alison [2 ]
Sadowsky, Steven J. [3 ]
Daubert, Diane M. [4 ]
Kapila, Yvonne [5 ]
Sharma, Arun B. [6 ]
Conte, Gregory J. [8 ]
Yonemura, Craig Y. [7 ]
Marinello, Carlo P. [8 ]
Kao, Rich [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Prosthodont, Sch Dent, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Grad Prosthodont, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Pacific, Arthur A Dugoni Sch Dent, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Periodont, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orofacial Sci, Periodontol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Dent, Grad Prosthodont, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Dent, Div Periodont, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[8] Univ Basel, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
antiresorptive agents; diabetes; peri-implantitis; periodontal disease; risk assessment; smoking; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; MARGINAL BONE LOSS; GENERALIZED AGGRESSIVE PERIODONTITIS; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; DENTAL RESIN MONOMERS; SOFT-TISSUE THICKNESS; 14-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; INTERIMPLANT DISTANCE;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.7025
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the current scientific evidence on estimating cumulative risk for biologic complications relating to dental implants and to develop a patient-centered risk assessment tool for establishing aggregate risk. Materials and Methods: A review of the scientific literature on risk indicators relating to dental implants was completed with the goal of identifying and weighting individual risk indicators so aggregate biologic risk could be estimated. Three authors completed independent reviews of the literature, identifying 31 systematic reviews on risk indicators for biologic complications with dental implants, from which 24 potential risk indicators were considered. Due to inconclusive scientific data on risk indicators, a Delphi process was used to gather structured expert opinion to supplement findings from the literature. Eleven Delphi participants with expertise in prosthodontics or periodontics participated in two email exchanges and one face-to-face meeting to comment and debate on the initial identification and weighting of risk indicators, propose the addition or removal of risk indicators, and provide recommended clinical management for each risk indicator. Results: After literature review, three rounds of debate, and additions and removals of various risk indicators, consensus (defined as 95% or more in agreement) was achieved on 20 risk indicators. The Delphi group concluded that the risk indicators of smoking, diabetes, periodontal disease, plaque levels, antiresorptive agents, and cemented restorations should include subcategories to more accurately identify and represent patient-specific risk. Clinical recommendations based on individual and aggregate risk were established by consensus. Conclusion: The literature on risk indicators for biologic complications was conflicting and inconclusive. The Delphi method was used to identify and establish the weighting of individual risk indicators, resulting in a risk assessment tool for estimating aggregate risk.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 520
页数:15
相关论文
共 194 条
[1]   Hypoglycemia in Older People - A Less Well Recognized Risk Factor for Frailty [J].
Abdelhafiz, Ahmed H. ;
Rodriguez-Manas, Leocadio ;
Morley, John E. ;
Sinclair, Alan J. .
AGING AND DISEASE, 2015, 6 (02) :156-167
[2]   Proton pump inhibitor use and fracture risk - effect modification by histamine H-1 receptor blockade. Observational case-control study using National Prescription Data [J].
Abrahamsen, Bo ;
Vestergaard, Peter .
BONE, 2013, 57 (01) :269-271
[3]   Peri-implant evaluation of immediately loaded implants placed in esthetic zone in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: a two-year study [J].
Aguilar-Salvatierra, Antonio ;
Luis Calvo-Guirado, Jose ;
Gonzalez-Jaranay, Maximino ;
Moreu, Gerardo ;
Arcesio Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael ;
Gomez-Moreno, Gerardo .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (02) :156-161
[4]   What is the effect of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone loss around dental implants? A systematic review [J].
Akcali, Aliye ;
Trullenque-Eriksson, Anna ;
Sun, Chuanming ;
Petrie, Aviva ;
Nibali, Luigi ;
Donos, Nikolaos .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (09) :1046-1053
[5]   Biochemical risk markers and 10-year incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: independent predictors, improvement in pooled cohort equation, and risk reclassification [J].
Akintoye, Emmanuel ;
Briasoulis, Alexandros ;
Afonso, Luis .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 193 :95-103
[6]   Influence of interimplant distance on the crestal bone height around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Al Amri, Mohammad D. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (03) :278-282
[7]   Systemic administration of omeprazole interferes with bone healing and implant osseointegration: an invivo study on rat tibiae [J].
Al Subaie, Ahmed ;
Emami, Elham ;
Tamimi, Iskandar ;
Laurenti, Marco ;
Eimar, Hazem ;
Abdallah, Mohamed-Nur ;
Tamimi, Faleh .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 43 (02) :193-203
[8]   Spontaneous progression of experimental peri-implantitis at implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in dogs [J].
Albouy, Jean-Pierre ;
Abrahamsson, Ingemar ;
Berglundh, Tord .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 39 (02) :182-187
[9]   Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection [J].
Alsaadi, Ghada ;
Quirynen, Marc ;
Komarek, Arnost ;
van Steenberghe, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2007, 34 (07) :610-617
[10]   Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants [J].
Annibali, Susanna ;
Bignozzi, Isabella ;
Cristalli, Maria Paola ;
Graziani, Filippo ;
La Monaca, Gerardo ;
Polimeni, Antonella .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 39 (11) :1097-1113