The use of the Levenberg-Marquardt curve-fitting algorithm in pharmacokinetic modelling of DCE-MRI data

被引:78
作者
Ahearn, TS [1 ]
Staff, RT
Redpath, TW
Semple, SIK
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Biomed Phys, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Grampian Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Radiol, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/50/9/N02
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The use of curve-fitting and compartmental modelling for calculating physiological parameters from measured data has increased in popularity in recent years. Finding the 'best fit' of a model to data involves the minimization of a merit function. An example of a merit function is the sum of the squares of the differences between the data points and the model estimated points. This is facilitated by curve-fitting algorithms. Two curve-fitting methods, Levenberg-Marquardt and MINPACK-1, are investigated with respect to the search start points that they require and the accuracy of the returned fits. We have simulated one million dynamic contrast enhanced MRI curves using a range of parameters and investigated the use of single and multiple search starting points. We found that both algorithms, when used with a single starting point, return unreliable fits. When multiple start points are used, we found that both algorithms returned reliable parameters. However the MINPACK-1 method generally outperformed the Levenberg-Marquardt method. We conclude that the use of a single starting point when fitting compartmental modelling data such as this produces unsafe results and we recommend the use of multiple start points in order to find the global minima.
引用
收藏
页码:N85 / N92
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1980, USER GUIDE MINPACK 1
  • [2] PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS IN CNS GD-DTPA ENHANCED MR IMAGING
    BRIX, G
    SEMMLER, W
    PORT, R
    SCHAD, LR
    LAYER, G
    LORENZ, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (04) : 621 - 628
  • [3] QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MULTISLICE GD-DTPA ENHANCED DYNAMIC MR-IMAGES USING AN AUTOMATED SIMPLEX MINIMIZATION PROCEDURE
    BUCKLEY, DL
    KERSLAKE, RW
    BLACKBAND, SJ
    HORSMAN, A
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1994, 32 (05) : 646 - 651
  • [4] Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI
    Buckley, DL
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (03) : 601 - 606
  • [5] Determining and optimizing the precision of quantitative measurements of perfusion from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI
    Dale, BM
    Jesberger, JA
    Lewin, JS
    Hillenbrand, CM
    Duerk, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 18 (05) : 575 - 584
  • [6] Water diffusion and exchange as they influence contrast enhancement
    Donahue, KM
    Weisskoff, RM
    Burstein, D
    [J]. JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (01): : 102 - 110
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging contrast-enhanced relaxometry of breast tumors:: an MRI multicenter investigation concerning 100 patients
    Eliat, PA
    Dedieu, V
    Bertino, C
    Bouté, V
    Lacroix, J
    Constans, JM
    de Kovrin, B
    Vincent, C
    Bailly, C
    Joffre, F
    de Certaines, J
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 22 (04) : 475 - 481
  • [8] New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors
    Fan, XB
    Medved, M
    River, JN
    Zamora, M
    Corot, C
    Robert, P
    Bourrinet, P
    Lipton, M
    Culp, RM
    Karczmar, GS
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (03) : 487 - 494
  • [9] A RAPIDLY CONVERGENT DESCENT METHOD FOR MINIMIZATION
    FLETCHER, R
    POWELL, MJD
    [J]. COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1963, 6 (02) : 163 - &
  • [10] FOSTER DM, 1994, BMES BULL, V18, P19