Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: Perceived behavioural control or affective attitude?

被引:247
作者
Kraft, P
Rise, J
Sutton, S
Roysamb, E
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
关键词
D O I
10.1348/014466604X17533
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A study was conducted to explore (a) the dimensional structure of perceived behavioural control (PBC), (b) the conceptual basis of perceived difficulty items, and (c) how PBC components and instrumental and affective attitudes, respectively, relate to intention and behaviour. The material stemmed from a two-wave study of Norwegian graduate students (N = 227 for the prediction of intention and N = 110 for the prediction of behaviour). Data were analysed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multiple regression by the application of structural equation modelling (SEM). CFA suggested that PBC could be conceived of as consisting of three separate but interrelated factors (perceived control, perceived confidence and perceived difficulty), or as two separate but interrelated factors representing self-efficacy (measured by perceived difficulty and perceived confidence or by just perceived confidence) and perceived control. However, the perceived difficulty items also overlapped substantially with affective attitude. Perceived confidence was a strong predictor of exercise intention but not of recycling intention. Perceived control, however, was a strong predictor of recycling intention but not exercise intention. Affective attitudes but not instrumental attitudes were identified as substantial predictors of intentions. The findings suggest that at least under some circumstances it may be inadequate to measure PBC by means of perceived difficulty. One possible consequence may be that the role of PBC as a predictor of intention is somewhat overestimated, whereas the role of (affective) attitude may be similarly underestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 496
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
AJN I, 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU
[2]   Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior [J].
Ajzen, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (04) :665-683
[3]   APPLICATION OF THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR TO LEISURE CHOICE [J].
AJZEN, I ;
DRIVER, BL .
JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 1992, 24 (03) :207-224
[4]   CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN HEALTH ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I ;
TIMKO, C .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 7 (04) :259-276
[5]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[6]   PREDICTION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR - ATTITUDES, INTENTIONS, AND PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL-CONTROL [J].
AJZEN, I ;
MADDEN, TJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 22 (05) :453-474
[7]  
Ajzen I., 2005, Attitudes, personality, and behavior, VSecond
[8]  
Ajzen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[9]  
Ajzen I., 2002, Construction of a standard questionnaire for the theory of planned behavior
[10]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14