A Trans-Governmental Collaboration to Independently Evaluate SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays

被引:11
作者
Pinto, Ligia A. [1 ]
Shawar, Ribhi M. [2 ]
O'Leary, Brendan [2 ]
Kemp, Troy J. [1 ]
Cherry, James [3 ]
Thornburg, Natalie [4 ]
Miller, Cheryl N. [1 ]
Gallagher, Pamela S. [2 ]
Stenzel, Timothy [2 ]
Schuck, Brittany [2 ]
Owen, S. Michele [4 ]
Kondratovich, Marina [2 ]
Satheshkumar, Panayampalli S. [4 ]
Schuh, Amy [4 ]
Lester, Sandra [4 ]
Cassetti, M. Cristina [5 ]
Sharpless, Norman E. [3 ]
Gitterman, Steven [2 ]
Lowy, Douglas R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Frederick Natl Lab Canc Res, Frederick, MD 21701 USA
[2] US FDA, Silver Spring, MD USA
[3] Natl Canc Inst, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Natl Inst Allergy & Infect Dis, Bethesda, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Emergency Use Authorization; SAR-CoV-2; serology assay; evaluation panel;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.01564-21
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 created a crucial need for serology assays to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, which led to many serology assays entering the market A trans-government collaboration was created in April 2020 to independently evaluate the performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology assays and help inform U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory decisions. To assess assay performance, three evaluation panels with similar antibody titer distributions were assembled. Each panel consisted of 110 samples with positive (n = 30) serum samples with a wide range of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers and negative (n = 80) plasma and/or serum samples that were collected before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic Each sample was characterized for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against the spike protein using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Samples were selected for the panel when there was agreement on seropositivity by laboratories at National Cancer Institute's Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI-FNLCR) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDQ. The sensitivity and specificity of each assay were assessed to determine Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) suitability. As of January 8, 2021, results from 91 evaluations were made publicly available (https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/, and https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html). Sensitivity ranged from 27% to 100% for IgG (n = 81), from 10% to 100% for IgM (n = 74), and from 73% to 100% for total or pan-immunoglobulins (n = 5). The combined specificity ranged from 58% to 100% (n = 91). Approximately one-third (n = 27) of the assays evaluated are now authorized by FDA for emergency use. This collaboration established a framework for assay performance evaluation that could be used for future outbreaks and could serve as a model for other technologies. IMPORTANCE The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic created a crucial need for accurate serology assays to evaluate seroprevalence and antiviral immune responses. The initial flood of serology assays entering the market with inadequate performance emphasized the need for independent evaluation of commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays using performance evaluation panels to determine suitability for use under EUA. Through a government-wide collaborative network 91 commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology assay evaluations were performed. Three evaluation panels with similar overall antibody titer distributions were assembled to evaluate performance. Nearly one-third of the assays evaluated met acceptable performance recommendations, and two assays had EUAs revoked and were removed from the U.S. market based on inadequate performance. Data for all serology assays evaluated are available at the FDA and CDC websites (https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/, and https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Altman D.G., 2000, STAT CONFIDENCE, V2nd, P105
[2]  
[Anonymous], FAQs on Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, In Vitro Diagnostics EUAs
[4]  
FDA, 2020, Policy for Diagnostics Testing in Laboratories Certified to Perform High Complexity Testing Under CLIA prior to Emergency Use Authorization for Coronavirus Disease-2019 during the Public Health Emergency (Immediately In Effect Guidance for Clinical Laboratories and Food and Drug Administration Staff)
[5]  
FDA, 2021, ANT TEST IS NOT COMM
[6]  
FDA, 2020, IMPORTANT INFORM USE
[7]  
Freeman Brandi, 2020, bioRxiv, DOI 10.1101/2020.04.24.057323
[8]  
Garrett P, 2008, EP12A2 CLSI, V28
[9]   An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2-Preliminary Report [J].
Jackson, L. A. ;
Anderson, E. J. ;
Rouphael, N. G. ;
Roberts, P. C. ;
Makhene, M. ;
Coler, R. N. ;
McCullough, M. P. ;
Chappell, J. D. ;
Denison, M. R. ;
Stevens, L. J. ;
Pruijssers, A. J. ;
McDermott, A. ;
Flach, B. ;
Doria-Rose, N. A. ;
Corbett, K. S. ;
Morabito, K. M. ;
O'Dell, S. ;
Schmidt, S. D. ;
Swanson, P. A. ;
Padilla, M. ;
Mascola, J. R. ;
Neuzil, K. M. ;
Bennett, H. ;
Sun, W. ;
Peters, E. ;
Makowski, M. ;
Albert, J. ;
Cross, K. ;
Buchanan, W. ;
Pikaart-Tautges, R. ;
Ledgerwood, J. E. ;
Graham, B. S. ;
Beigel, J. H. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 383 (20) :1920-1931
[10]  
Laurent L., 2020, BLOOMBERG LP