Unravelling biogeochemical drivers of methylmercury production in an Arctic fen soil and a bog soil

被引:12
作者
Zhang, Lijie [1 ,2 ]
Philben, Michael [1 ]
Tas, Neslihan [3 ]
Johs, Alexander [1 ]
Yang, Ziming [4 ]
Wullschleger, Stan D. [1 ]
Graham, David E. [5 ]
Pierce, Eric M. [1 ]
Gu, Baohua [1 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Environm Sci Div, POB 2009, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] New Jersey Inst Technol, Dept Chem & Environm Sci, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Climate & Ecosyst Sci Div, Berkeley, CA USA
[4] Oakland Univ, Dept Chem, Rochester, MI 48309 USA
[5] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Biosci Div, POB 2009, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
关键词
Mercury; Methylation; Acetate; Sulfate; Microbial community; Syntrophy; MERCURY METHYLATION; SALTWATER INTRUSION; PERIPHYTON BIOFILMS; SULFATE; TUNDRA; SEDIMENTS; CARBON; WATER; DEGRADATION; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118878
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Arctic tundra soils store a globally significant amount of mercury (Hg), which could be transformed to the neurotoxic methylmercury (MeHg) upon warming and thus poses serious threats to the Arctic ecosystem. However, our knowledge of the biogeochemical drivers of MeHg production is limited in these soils. Using substrate addition (acetate and sulfate) and selective microbial inhibition approaches, we investigated the geochemical drivers and dominant microbial methylators in 60-day microcosm incubations with two tundra soils: a circumneutral fen soil and an acidic bog soil, collected near Nome, Alaska, United States. Results showed that increasing acetate concentration had negligible influences on MeHg production in both soils. However, inhibition of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) completely stalled MeHg production in the fen soil in the first 15 days, whereas addition of sulfate in the low-sulfate bog soil increased MeHg production by 5-fold, suggesting prominent roles of SRB in Hg(II) methylation. Without the addition of sulfate in the bog soil or when sulfate was depleted in the fen soil (after 15 days), both SRB and methanogens contributed to MeHg production. Analysis of microbial community composition confirmed the presence of several phyla known to harbor microorganisms associated with Hg(II) methylation in the soils. The observations suggest that SRB and methanogens were mainly responsible for Hg(II) methylation in these tundra soils, although their relative contributions depended on the availability of sulfate and possibly syntrophic metabolisms between SRB and methanogens.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Formation and mobilization of methylmercury across natural and experimental sulfur deposition gradients [J].
Akerblom, Staffan ;
Nilsson, Mats B. ;
Skyllberg, Ulf ;
Bjorn, Erik ;
Jonsson, Sofi ;
Ranneby, Bo ;
Bishop, Kevin .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 263
[2]  
ALLI A, 1994, HRC-J HIGH RES CHROM, V17, P745
[3]   Comparison of arsenate, chromate and molybdate binding on schwertmannite: Surface adsorption vs anion-exchange [J].
Antelo, Juan ;
Fiol, Sarah ;
Gondar, Dora ;
Lopez, Rocio ;
Arce, Florencio .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2012, 386 :338-343
[4]   Mercury (micro)biogeochemistry in polar environments [J].
Barkay, Tamar ;
Poulain, Alexandre J. .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2007, 59 (02) :232-241
[5]   DemethylationThe Other Side of the Mercury Methylation Coin: A Critical Review [J].
Barkay, Tamar ;
Gu, Baohua .
ACS ENVIRONMENTAL AU, 2021, 2 (02) :77-97
[6]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[7]   Reduction of molybdate by sulfate-reducing bacteria [J].
Biswas, Keka C. ;
Woodards, Nicole A. ;
Xu, Huifang ;
Barton, Larry L. .
BIOMETALS, 2009, 22 (01) :131-139
[8]   Selective extractions to assess the biogeochemically relevant fractionation of inorganic mercury in sediments and soils [J].
Bloom, NS ;
Preus, E ;
Katon, J ;
Hiltner, M .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2003, 479 (02) :233-248
[9]   Artifact formation of methyl mercury during aqueous distillation and alternative techniques for the extraction of methyl mercury from environmental samples [J].
Bloom, NS ;
Colman, JA ;
Barber, L .
FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 358 (03) :371-377
[10]  
Bokulich NA, 2013, NAT METHODS, V10, P57, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.2276, 10.1038/nmeth.2276]