Transcranial direct current stimulation induces polarity-specific changes of cortical blood perfusion in the rat

被引:92
作者
Wachter, Dorothee [1 ]
Wrede, Arne [3 ]
Schulz-Schaeffer, Walter [3 ]
Taghizadeh-Waghefi, Ali [1 ]
Nitsche, Michael A. [2 ]
Kutschenko, Anna [2 ]
Rohde, Veit [1 ]
Liebetanz, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Neurosurg, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Neuropathol, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Cerebral blood flow; CBF; Laser Doppler flowmetry; tDCS; Stroke; MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION; DC-STIMULATION; HUMAN BRAIN; STROKE; EXCITABILITY; MODULATION; ACTIVATION; RECOVERY; HUMANS; TDCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.12.005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces changes in cortical excitability and improves hand-motor function in chronic stroke. These effects depend on polarity, duration of stimulation and current intensity applied. Towards evaluating the therapeutic potential of tDCS in acute stroke, we investigated tDCS-effects on cerebral blood flow (CBF) in a tDCS rat model adapted for this purpose. Methods: In a randomised crossover design eight Sprague-Dawley rats received three single cathodal and anodal tDCS for 15 min every other day. At each polarity, current intensities of 25,50 and 100 mu A were applied. CBF was measured prior and after tDCS for at least 30 min with laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Results: At higher intensities (50 and 100 mu A) anodal tDCS increased CBF up to 30 min. At 100 mu A CBF was increased by about 25%, at 50 mu A by about 18%. In contrast, cathodal tDCS led to a decrease of CBF, likewise depending on the current intensity applied. At 100 mu A the effects were about 25% of baseline levels and persisted for at least 30 min. At 25 and 50 mu A, baseline-levels were mostly re-established within 30 min. Conclusions: tDCS modulates CBF in a polarity specific way, the extent of modulation depending on the stimulation parameters applied. Because of its polarity-specificity, we assume that CBF-alterations are causally related to tDCS-induced alterations in cortical excitability via neuro-vascular coupling. tDCS may constitute a therapeutic option in acute stroke patients or in patients at risk for vasospasm-induced ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 327
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Polarity-Specific Cortical Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex of Healthy Humans
    Rehmann, Robert
    Sczesny-Kaiser, Matthias
    Lenz, Melanie
    Gucia, Tomasz
    Schliesing, Annika
    Schwenkreis, Peter
    Tegenthoff, Martin
    Hoffken, Oliver
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [2] Polarity-specific transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts auditory pitch learning
    Matsushita, Reiko
    Andoh, Jamila
    Zatorre, Robert J.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9 : 174
  • [3] Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation induces regional, long-lasting reductions of cortical blood flow in rats
    Mielke, Dorothee
    Wrede, Arne
    Schulz-Schaeffer, Walter
    Taghizadeh-Waghefi, Ali
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Rohde, Veit
    Liebetanz, David
    NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 35 (10) : 1029 - 1037
  • [4] Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study
    Jamil, Asif
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Kuo, Hsiao-, I
    Meesen, Raf L. J.
    Dechent, Peter
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2020, 41 (06) : 1644 - 1666
  • [5] Polarity-specific effects of motor transcranial direct current stimulation on MARI resting state networks
    Amadi, Ugwechi
    Ilie, Andrei
    Johansen-Berg, Heidi
    Stagg, Charlotte Jane
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 88 : 155 - 161
  • [6] Task-dependent and polarity-specific effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical activation during word fluency
    Ehlis, Ann-Christine
    Haeussinger, Florian B.
    Gastel, Alex
    Fallgatter, Andreas J.
    Plewnia, Christian
    NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 140 : 134 - 140
  • [7] Polarity-specific high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the anterior and posterior default mode network improves remote memory retrieval
    Huang, Yuefeng
    Mohan, Anusha
    McLeod, S. Lauren
    Luckey, Alison M.
    Hart Jr, John
    Vanneste, Sven
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (04) : 1005 - 1014
  • [8] Polarity-specific modulation of pain processing by transcranial direct current stimulation – a blinded longitudinal fMRI study
    Steffen Naegel
    Josephine Biermann
    Nina Theysohn
    Christoph Kleinschnitz
    Hans-Christoph Diener
    Zaza Katsarava
    Mark Obermann
    Dagny Holle
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2018, 19
  • [9] Polarity-specific modulation of pain processing by transcranial direct current stimulation - a blinded longitudinal fMRI study
    Naegel, Steffen
    Biermann, Josephine
    Theysohn, Nina
    Kleinschnitz, Christoph
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Katsarava, Zaza
    Obermann, Mark
    Holle, Dagny
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2018, 19
  • [10] Polarity and subfield specific effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on hippocampal plasticity
    Rohan, Joyce G.
    Miklasevich, Molly K.
    McInturf, Shawn M.
    Bechmann, Naomi A.
    Moore, Raquel J.
    Hatcher-Solis, Candice
    Jankord, Ryan
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 2020, 167