A novel case-control design to estimate the extent of over-diagnosis of breast cancer due to organised population-based mammography screening

被引:27
作者
Beckmann, Kerri R. [1 ]
Lynch, John W. [1 ]
Hiller, Janet E. [1 ,2 ]
Farshid, Gelareh [3 ]
Houssami, Nehmat [4 ]
Duffy, Stephen W. [5 ]
Roder, David M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Populat Hlth, 178 North Terrace,Level 7, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Swinburne Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] BreastScreen SA, Clin Serv, Wayville, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[5] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, London, England
[6] Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
breast cancer; mammography screening; over-diagnosis; OVERDIAGNOSIS; OVERTREATMENT; PROGRAMS; EFFICACY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.29124
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Debate about the extent of breast cancer over-diagnosis due to mammography screening has continued for over a decade, without consensus. Estimates range from 0 to 54%, but many studies have been criticized for having flawed methodology. In this study we used a novel study design to estimate over-diagnosis due to organised mammography screening in South Australia (SA). To estimate breast cancer incidence at and following screening we used a population-based, age-matched case-control design involving 4,931 breast cancer cases and 22,914 controls to obtain OR for yearly time intervals since women's last screening mammogram. The level of over-diagnosis was estimated by comparing the cumulative breast cancer incidence with and without screening. The former was derived by applying ORs for each time window to incidence rates in the absence of screening, and the latter, by projecting pre-screening incidence rates. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess potential biases. Over-diagnosis was estimated to be 8% (95%CI 2-14%) and 14% (95%CI 8-19%) among SA women aged 45 to 85 years from 2006-2010, for invasive breast cancer and all breast cancer respectively. These estimates were robust when applying various sensitivity analyses, except for adjustment for potential confounding assuming higher risk among screened than non-screened women, which reduced levels of over-diagnosis to 1% (95%CI 5-7%) and 8% (95%CI 2-14%) respectively when incidence rates for screening participants were adjusted by 10%. Our results indicate that the level of over-diagnosis due to mammography screening is modest and considerably lower than many previous estimates, including others for Australia. What's new? The detection of abnormal growths in the breast that never become clinically significant is a known limitation of mammography screening. Nonetheless, the extent to which mammography contributes to the overdiagnosis of breast cancer is unclear. Here, among women ages 45 to 85 in South Australia, the extent of overdiagnosis due to mammography screening was estimated to be 8 percent for invasive breast cancer and 14 percent for all breast cancers. The estimates decreased following adjustment for potential risk factors. The findings suggest that the risk of overdiagnosis with mammography screening is modest, particularly for invasive disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1411 / 1421
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, STAT STAT SOFTW REL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, IARC HDB CANC PREV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, INFORM PAPER INTRO S
[4]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012, 3101 0 AUSTR DEM STA
[5]  
Australian Electoral Commission, 2013, SIZ EL ROLL EST PART
[6]   Do breast cancer risk factors differ among those who do and do not undertake mammography screening? [J].
Beckmann, Kerri R. ;
Roder, David M. ;
Hiller, Janet E. ;
Farshid, Gelareh ;
Lynch, John W. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2013, 20 (04) :208-219
[7]   Screening for breast cancer: Recommendations and rationale [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, PS ;
Homer, CJ ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Pender, NJ ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (05) :344-346
[8]   Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review [J].
Biesheuvel, Corne ;
Barratt, Alexandra ;
Howard, Kirsten ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Irwig, Les .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (12) :1129-1138
[9]   Sustained lower rates of HRT prescribing and breast cancer incidence in Australia since 2003 [J].
Canfell, Karen ;
Banks, Emily ;
Clements, Mark ;
Kang, Yoon Jung ;
Moa, Aye ;
Armstrong, Bruce ;
Beral, Valerie .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 117 (03) :671-673
[10]  
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010, REG PLUS LINK PLUS