Combining accident modeling and quantitative risk assessment in safety management

被引:2
作者
Chen, Liqiong [1 ]
Li, Xia [1 ]
Cui, Tao [2 ]
Ma, Jianlin [2 ]
Liu, Hong [2 ]
Zhang, Zhijian [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Petr & Gas Engn, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] China Natl Petr Corp, Southwest Pipeline Co, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] China Natl Petr Corp, Dehong Oil & Gas Co, Dehong, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Accident model; quantitative risk assessment; safety barrier; safety management; NATURAL-GAS; PIPELINE; OIL; INTEGRITY; INDUSTRY; TRANSPARENT; SIMULATION; INCIDENTS; SYSTEMS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1177/1687814017726002
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Syncretic oil pumping-gas compression stations exist because oil and gas pipelines often run parallel to one another. Risk assessment and safety management present challenges in these stations because they house large numbers of devices that perform complicated operations. Quantitative risk assessment is effective in predicting probabilities and consequences of accidents; however, this method does not clearly address accident causation and other important factors that can lead to major accidents. To supplement quantitative risk assessment, this article proposes a safety barrier-based accident model for oil and gas stations based on the Swiss cheese model. An example is employed to illustrate the application of the combined method in safety management. Risk levels for different subsystems are calculated in quantitative risk assessment, and safety barriers with bad performance in high-risk subsystems are identified based on the proposed accident model. These results indicate that the combined method can be efficient for a complicated system since it helps the operators focus on the cells with high risk instead of the whole system.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   On how to define, understand and describe risk [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (06) :623-631
[2]  
Bird F.E., 1996, Practical loss control leadership
[3]   Quantitative assessment of environmental risk due to accidental spills from onshore pipelines [J].
Bonvicini, Sarah ;
Antonioni, Giacomo ;
Morra, Pamela ;
Cozzani, Valerio .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2015, 93 :31-49
[4]   Risk assessment in the offshore industry [J].
Brandsæter, A .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2002, 40 (1-4) :231-269
[5]  
CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety), 2000, GUID CHEM PROC QUANT
[6]  
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), 2001, LAYER PROT AN SIMPL, P11
[7]   Development of new correlations for improved integrity assessment of pipes and pipe bends [J].
Chattopadhyay, J. ;
Dutta, B. K. ;
Vaze, K. K. .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2014, 269 :108-115
[8]   Fire spread simulation using GIS: Aiming at urban natural gas pipeline [J].
Cheng, Liang ;
Li, Shuang ;
Ma, Lei ;
Li, Manchun ;
Ma, Xiaoxue .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 75 :23-35
[9]   Organizing learning processes on risks by using the bow-tie representation [J].
Chevreau, FR ;
Wybo, JL ;
Cauchois, D .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2006, 130 (03) :276-283
[10]   Probability Bow-ties - A transparent risk management tool [J].
Cockshott, JE .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2005, 83 (B4) :307-316