Benefit estimation for different types of bikeways using contingent valuation method

被引:1
作者
Lee, Jang-Ho [1 ]
Han, Sangyong [2 ]
Shin, Hee Cheol [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Natl Univ Transportat, Dept Railrd Infrastruct Engn, Uiwang, South Korea
[2] Dongseo Univ, Dept Int Logist, Busan, South Korea
[3] Korea Transport Inst, Dept Ind Revolut & Transport 4, Sejong, South Korea
关键词
Benefit; bikeway; contingent valuation method; willingness-to-pay; BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE; WELFARE EVALUATIONS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ROUTE CHOICE; FACILITIES; PREFERENCES; NETWORK; STREET; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/15568318.2020.1718254
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Investing in cycling facilities is a common strategy that is used to increase the level of cycling. As the demand for the installation of bike facilities increases, it is becoming necessary to carefully examine installation costs and benefits by the type of bike facilities. In particular, we used the contingent valuation method to estimate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of additional tax per household as a bid for three types of bikeways, i.e., bike lanes, bike paths shared with pedestrians, and cycle tracks. Specifically, four kinds of modeling approaches, i.e., the single-bounded model, the double-bounded model, the Spike model, and the one-and-one-half-bounded (OOHB) model, were evaluated. Consequently, we analyzed the benefits of the bikeway in Goyang, South Korea, using the WTPs from these four models. The results showed that users are willing to pay the highest price for cycle tracks, and this was followed by bike paths shared with pedestrians and bike lanes. The results of this research can be a useful resource for analyzing users' preferences concerning the type of bikeways and for estimating the benefits of bikeways. This information will be useful to policy makers in their efforts to make decisions for new bike facilities and to increase the level of cycling.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 186
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Sidewalk bicycling safety issues
    Aultman-Hall, L
    Adams, MF
    [J]. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN RESEARCH 1998, 1998, (1636): : 71 - 76
  • [2] Exploring the impact of walk-bike infrastructure, safety perception, and built-environment on active transportation mode choice: a random parameter model using New York City commuter data
    Aziz, H. M. Abdul
    Nagle, Nicholas N.
    Morton, April M.
    Hilliard, Michael R.
    White, Devin A.
    Stewart, Robert N.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2018, 45 (05) : 1207 - 1229
  • [3] The value of time and external benefits in bicycle appraisal
    Borjesson, Maria
    Eliasson, Jonas
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (04) : 673 - 683
  • [4] Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data
    Broach, Joseph
    Dill, Jennifer
    Gliebe, John
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (10) : 1730 - 1740
  • [5] Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling
    Buehler, Ralph
    Dill, Jennifer
    [J]. TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2016, 36 (01) : 9 - 27
  • [6] Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes
    Buehler, Ralph
    Pucher, John
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2012, 39 (02) : 409 - 432
  • [7] Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences - A case study of Dublin
    Caulfield, Brian
    Brick, Elaine
    McCarthy, Orla Therese
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 17 (05) : 413 - 417
  • [9] One-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Cooper, JC
    Hanemann, M
    Signorello, G
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (04) : 742 - 750
  • [10] Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities - If you build them, commuters will use them
    Dill, J
    Carr, T
    [J]. PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES 2003: SAFETY AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2003, (1828): : 116 - 123