The broad spectrum of quality in deceased donor kidneys

被引:154
作者
Schold, JD [1 ]
Kaplan, B
Baliga, RS
Meier-Kriesche, HU
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Lifellink Healthcare Inst, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
deceased donor; expanded criteria donor; graft survival; kidney; renal transplantation; risk factors;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00770.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The quality of the deceased donor organ clearly is one of the most crucial factors in determining graft survival and function in recipients of a kidney transplant. There has been considerable effort made towards evaluating these organs culminating in an amendment to allocation policy with the introduction of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) policy. Our study, from first solitary adult deceased donor transplant recipients from 1996 to 2002 in the National Scientific Transplant Registry database, presents a donor kidney risk grade based on significant donor characteristics, donor-recipient matches and cold ischemia time, generated directly from their risk for graft loss. We investigated the impact of our donor risk grade in a naive cohort on short- and long-term graft survival, as well as in subgroups of the population. The projected half-lives for overall graft survival in recipients by donor risk grade were I (10.7 years), II (10.0 years), III (7.9 years), IV (5.7 years) and V (4.5 years). This study indicates that there is great variability in the quality of deceased donor kidneys and that the assessment of risk might be enhanced by this scoring system as compared to the simple two-tiered system of the current ECD classification.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 765
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Alexander JW, 1996, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V10, P1
  • [2] Utilization of suboptimal kidney donors
    Faenza, A
    Sestigliani, E
    Zambianchi, L
    Ridolfi, L
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (03) : 485 - 487
  • [3] The stability of the glomerular filtration rate after renal transplantation is improving
    Gourishankar, S
    Hunsicker, LG
    Jhangri, GS
    Cockfield, SM
    Halloran, PF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 (09): : 2387 - 2394
  • [4] Lenhard V, 1980, Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc, V17, P450
  • [5] Does cadaveric donor renal transplantation ever provide better outcomes than live-donor renal transplantation?
    Mandal, AK
    Snyder, JJ
    Gilbertson, DT
    Collins, AJ
    Silkensen, JR
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (04) : 494 - 500
  • [6] Expanded criteria donors: Attempts to increase the renal transplant donor pool
    Mandal, AK
    Kalligonis, AN
    Ratner, LE
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY, 2000, 7 (02): : 117 - 130
  • [7] Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome
    Meier-Kriesche, HU
    Port, FK
    Ojo, AO
    Rudich, SM
    Hanson, JA
    Cibrik, DM
    Leichtman, AB
    Kaplan, B
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 58 (03) : 1311 - 1317
  • [8] Merion RM, 2002, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V13, p47A
  • [9] Improved scoring system to assess adult donors for cadaver renal transplantation
    Nyberg, SL
    Matas, AJ
    Kremers, WK
    Thostenson, JD
    Larson, TS
    Prieto, M
    Ishitani, MB
    Sterioff, S
    Stegall, MD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 (06) : 715 - 721
  • [10] Donor scoring system for cadaveric renal transplantation
    Nyberg, SL
    Matas, AJ
    Rogers, M
    Harmsen, WS
    Velosa, JA
    Larson, TS
    Prieto, M
    Ishitani, MB
    Sterioff, S
    Stegall, MD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 1 (02) : 162 - 170