Surveillance of Women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Using Biannual Automated Breast US, MR Imaging, and Mammography

被引:61
作者
van Zelst, Jan C. M. [1 ]
Mus, Roel D. M. [1 ]
Woldringh, Gwendolyn [2 ]
Rutten, Matthieu J. C. M. [4 ]
Bult, Peter [3 ]
Vreemann, Suzan [1 ]
de Jong, Mathijn [4 ]
Karssemeijer, Nico [1 ]
Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline [2 ]
Mann, Ritse M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Route 766,Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Human Genet, Route 766,Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Route 766,Geert Grootepl 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
关键词
PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT; SCREENING ULTRASOUND; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CANCER-DETECTION; FAMILIAL RISK; CARRIERS; MRISC; METAANALYSIS; POPULATION; PENETRANCE;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2017161218
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate a multimodal surveillance regimen including yearly full-field digital (FFD) mammography, dynamic contrast agent-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and biannual automated breast (AB) ultrasonography (US) in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Materials and Methods: This prospective multicenter trial enrolled 296 carriers of the BRCA mutation (153 BRCA1 and 128 BRCA2 carriers, and 15 women with first-degree untested relatives) between September 2010 and November 2012, with follow-up until November 2015. Participants underwent 2 years of intensified surveillance including biannual AB US, and routine yearly DCE MR imaging and FFD mammography. The surveillance performance for each modality and possible combinations were determined. Results: Breast cancer was screening-detected in 16 women (age range, 33-58 years). Three interval cancers were detected by self-examination, all in carriers of the BRCA1 mutation under age 43 years. One cancer was detected in a carrier of the BRCA1 mutation with a palpable abnormality in the contralateral breast. One incidental breast cancer was detected in a prophylactic mastectomy specimen. Respectively, sensitivity of DCE MR imaging, FFD mammography, and AB US was 68.1% (14 of 21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.9%, 85.8%), 37.2% (eight of 21; 95% CI: 19.8%, 58.7%), and 32.1% (seven of 21; 95% CI: 16.1%, 53.8%); specificity was 95.0% (643 of 682; 95% CI: 92.7%, 96.5%), 98.1% (638 of 652; 95% CI: 96.7%, 98.9%), and 95.1% (1030 of 1088; 95% CI: 93.5%, 96.3%); cancer detection rate was 2.0% (14 of 702), 1.2% (eight of 671), and 1.0% (seven of 711) per 100 women-years; and positive predictive value was 25.2% (14 of 54), 33.7% (nine of 23), and 9.5% (seven of 68). DCE MR imaging and FFD mammography combined yielded the highest sensitivity of 76.3% (16 of 21; 95% CI: 53.8%, 89.9%) and specificity of 93.6% (643 of 691; 95% CI: 91.3%, 95.3%). AB US did not depict additional cancers. FFD mammography yielded no additional cancers in women younger than 43 years, the mean age at diagnosis. In carriers of the BRCA2 mutation, sensitivity of FFD mammography with DCE MR imaging surveillance was 90.9% (10 of 11; 95% CI: 72.7%, 100%) and 60.0% (six of 10; 95% CI: 30.0%, 90.0%) in carriers of the BRCA1 mutation because of the high interval cancer rate in carriers of the BRCA1 mutation. Conclusion: AB US may not be of added value to yearly FFD mammography and DCE MR imaging surveillance of carriers of the BRCA mutation. Study results suggest that carriers of the BRCA mutation younger than 40 years may not benefit from FFD mammography surveillance in addition to DCE MR imaging. (C)RSNA, 2017
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 388
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Effect of chest x-rays on the risk of breast cancer among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study:: A report from the EMBRACE, GENEPSO, GEO-HEBON, and IBCCS Collaborators' Group [J].
Andrieu, Nadine ;
Easton, Douglas F. ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Rookus, Matti A. ;
Brohet, Richard ;
Cardis, Elisabeth ;
Antoniou, Antonis C. ;
Wagner, Teresa ;
Simard, Jacques ;
Evans, Gareth ;
Peock, Susan ;
Fricker, Jean-Pierre ;
Nogues, Catherine ;
Van't Veer, Laura ;
Van Leeuwen, Flora E. ;
Goldgar, David E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (21) :3361-3366
[2]   Sonographic correlations with the new molecular classification of invasive breast cancer [J].
Au-Yong, I. T. H. ;
Evans, A. J. ;
Taneja, S. ;
Rakha, E. A. ;
Green, A. R. ;
Paish, C. ;
Ellis, I. O. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (10) :2342-2348
[3]   Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype - A population-based study from the California Cancer Registry [J].
Bauer, Katrina R. ;
Brown, Monica ;
Cress, Rosemary D. ;
Parise, Carol A. ;
Caggiano, Vincent .
CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) :1721-1728
[4]   Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Blume, Jeffrey D. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Bohm-Velez, Marcela ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Evans, W. Phil ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Larsen, Linda Hovanessian ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Boparai, Karan .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (18) :2151-2163
[5]   Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Boehm-Velez, Marcela ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Evans, W. Phil, III ;
Larsen, Linda H. ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Adams, Amanda ;
Yeh, Nolin M. ;
Gabrielli, Glenna .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13) :1394-1404
[6]   Supplemental screening ultrasound increases cancer detection yield in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers [J].
Bosse, Kristin ;
Graeser, Monika ;
Gossmann, Axel ;
Hackenbroch, Matthias ;
Schmutzler, Rita K. ;
Rhiem, Kerstin .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 289 (03) :663-670
[7]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[8]   Assessing Improvement in Detection of Breast Cancer with Three-dimensional Automated Breast US in Women with Dense Breast Tissue: The Somoinsight Study [J].
Brem, Rachel F. ;
Tabar, Laszlo ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Inciardi, Marc F. ;
Guingrich, Jessica A. ;
Hashimoto, Beverly E. ;
Lander, Marla R. ;
Lapidus, Robert L. ;
Peterson, Mary Kay ;
Rapelyea, Jocelyn A. ;
Roux, Susan ;
Schilling, Kathy J. ;
Shah, Biren A. ;
Torrente, Jessica ;
Wynn, Ralph T. ;
Miller, Dave P. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (03) :663-673
[9]   Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance [J].
Chen, Sining ;
Parmigiani, Giovanni .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (11) :1329-1333
[10]   Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families [J].
Ford, D ;
Easton, DF ;
Stratton, M ;
Narod, S ;
Goldgar, D ;
Devilee, P ;
Bishop, DT ;
Weber, B ;
Lenoir, G ;
Chang-Claude, J ;
Sobol, H ;
Teare, MD ;
Struewing, J ;
Arason, A ;
Scherneck, S ;
Peto, J ;
Rebbeck, TR ;
Tonin, P ;
Neuhausen, S ;
Barkardottir, R ;
Eyfjord, J ;
Lynch, H ;
Ponder, BAJ ;
Gayther, SA ;
Birch, JM ;
Lindblom, A ;
Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ;
Bignon, Y ;
Borg, A ;
Hamann, U ;
Haites, N ;
Scott, RJ ;
Maugard, CM ;
Vasen, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 62 (03) :676-689