Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

被引:97
作者
Sasaki, Ryoko [1 ]
Takeda, Yuichiro
Funato, Osamu
Nitta, Hiroyuki
Kawamura, Hidenobu
Uesugi, Noriyuki
Sugai, Tamotsu
Wakabayashi, Go
Ohkohchi, Nobuhiro
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Comprehens Human Sci, Dept Surg, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[2] Iwate Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Morioka, Iwate 020, Japan
[3] Iwate Med Univ, Dept Cent Clin Lab, Div Pathol, Morioka, Iwate 020, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00268-007-9102-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The objective of this study was to determine whether carcinoma in situ at the bile duct margin is prognostically different from residual invasive carcinoma in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Summary Background Data Although there are many reports that the ductal margin status at bile duct resection stumps is a prognostic indicator in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, some patients who undergo resection with microscopic tumor involvement of the bile duct margin survive longer than expected. Methods A retrospective clinicopathological analysis of 128 patients who had undergone surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was conducted. The status of the bile duct resection margin was classifiedas negative in 105 patients (82.0%), positive for carcinoma in situ in 12 patients (9.4%), and positive for invasive carcinoma in 11 patients (8.6%). Results Ductal margin status was an independent prognostic indicator by both univariate (p = 0.0022) and multivariate (p = 0.0105) analyses, along with lymph node metastasis. There was no significant difference between patients with a negative ductal margin and those with a positive ductal margin with carcinoma in situ (p = 0.5247). The 5-year survival rate of patients with a positive ductal margin with carcinoma in situ (22.2%) was significantly better (p = 0.0241) than with invasive carcinoma (0%). There was a significant relationship between local recurrence and ductal margin status (p = 0.0401). Conclusions Among patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, invasive carcinoma at the ductal resection margins appears to have a significant relation to local recurrence and also a significant negative impact on survival, whereas residual carcinoma in situ does not. Discrimination whether carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma is present is important in clinical setting in which the resection margin at the ductal stump is positive.
引用
收藏
页码:1788 / 1796
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Ahrendt S A, 1996, Adv Surg, V30, P427
[2]  
Albores-Saavedra J, 2000, CANCER, V89, P508, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<508::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-D
[4]  
Albores-Saavedra J., 2000, Tumor of the gallbladder, extrahepatic bile ducts, P191
[5]  
Albores-Saavedra J., 1991, HISTOLOGICAL TYPING
[6]   MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN RESECTION FOR HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA [J].
BISMUTH, H ;
NAKACHE, R ;
DIAMOND, T .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 215 (01) :31-38
[7]  
BISMUTH H, 1975, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V140, P170
[8]  
BOERMA EJ, 1990, SURGERY, V108, P572
[10]   Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A review and commentary [J].
Chamberlain, RS ;
Blumgart, LH .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 7 (01) :55-66