Improved serological diagnosis of Poplar mosaic virus with monoclonal antibodies

被引:1
作者
Carra, A
Brocchi, E
De Simone, F
Luisoni, E
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dipartimento Colture Arboree, I-10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy
[2] CNR, Ist Virol Vegetale, I-10135 Turin, Italy
[3] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, I-25124 Brescia, Italy
关键词
ELISA; monoclonal antibodies; Carlavirus; Poplar mosaic virus;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.01.014
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Poplar prosaic virus (PopMV) is widespread in all countries where poplar is grown, and causes severe economic losses in terms of quantity and quality of wood production. Control is based on indexing, aimed at the production of healthy propagation material. The currently used diagnostic method is double antibody sandwich (DAS) ELISA with polyclonal antibodies, which is relatively simple and inexpensive and more reliable than visual inspection of symptoms in the nurseries. However, this method also has disadvantages, mainly low sensitivity in relation to low concentration and irregular distribution of the virus in the plant. In this study, a new diagnostic method for PopMV based on production and use of a monoclonal antibody (Mab) in a triple antibody sandwich (TAS) ELISA, is presented. The TAS-ELISA with monoclonal antibodies was optimised by testing a range of reagent combinations and concentrations. PopMV was detected by the optimised TAS-ELISA with sensitivity more than 100 times higher than by DAS-ELISA with polyclonal antibodies. Six PopMV isolates from four European countries were detected with the same efficiency, indicating that no limitations to the practical use of the TAS-ELISA arise due to excessive epitope-specificity of the monoclonal antibody employed. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 179
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Alioto D, 1999, PLANT PATHOL, V48, P735, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1999.00410.x
  • [2] COMPARATIVE SENSITIVITY OF DIFFERENT ELISA PROCEDURES FOR DETECTING MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES
    ALMOUDALLAL, Z
    ALTSCHUH, D
    BRIAND, JP
    VANREGENMORTEL, MHV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 1984, 68 (1-2) : 35 - 43
  • [3] BIDDLE PG, 1971, CMI AAB DESCR PL VIR
  • [4] Brocchi E, 1993, Rev Sci Tech, V12, P559
  • [5] BRUNT AA, 1984, CMI ABA DESCR PL VIR
  • [6] CHIU WF, 1988, PLANT VIRUSES, V4, P390
  • [7] CHARACTERISTICS OF MICROPLATE METHOD OF ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF PLANT-VIRUSES
    CLARK, MF
    ADAMS, AN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 1977, 34 (MAR) : 475 - 483
  • [8] COOPER JI, 1986, EUR J FOREST PATHOL, V16, P116
  • [9] COOPER JI, 1981, ANN APPL BIOL, V99, P53, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1981.tb05129.x
  • [10] COOPER JI, 1993, VIRUS DIS TREE SHRUB, P118