Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: development and validation of the 'RAYS' Scale and comparison with the SF-36

被引:30
作者
Rotstein, Z
Barak, Y
Noy, S
Achiron, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Neuroimmunol Unit, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[2] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Rehabil Unit, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
关键词
multiple sclerosis; quality of life; rating scale;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/12.6.511
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To develop a self-administered rating scale for quantifying quality of life (QoL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Methods. The RAYS scale items were derived from a source of 600 questions composed by our Centre's experts from commonly used instruments that assess physical, psychological, and social-familiar dimensions. Prior to finalization of the RAYS QoL, candidate items were administered to 15 health rehabilitation professionals. Clarity, importance, relevance and specificity were graded for each item by every professional independently. Items chosen for the final version were graded as good or excellent on all these aspects. The Medical Outcome Study Short Form-3G (SF-36) was used to compare health appraisal with the RAYS scale. Results. Each of the three subscales of the RAYS covers a different dimension (physical, psychological, and social-familial) and each includes 15 self-report items scored from 1 (best) to 4 (worse), focusing on the preceding week. Validation was achieved through administration of the scale to 50 randomly selected MS patients and to 50 age-, sex-, education- and family status-matched healthy controls. All RAYS dimensions among MS patients reached a Cronbach's coefficient alpha >0.8. Mean values for all dimensions were greater in patients than in controls (P< 0.002). Patients scored below norms for the general population in the majority of the SF-36 subscales ton average 32% lower). Significant correlation was found between the two scales especially in the physical and social functioning subscales. Conclusion. The RAYS scale demonstrated high internal consistency and significant discriminative value, and is thus a suitable disease-specific tool for measuring QoL in MS.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 517
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The assessment of hypertesive patients' life quality according to SF-36 questionnaire
    Woznicka, Lucyna
    Posadzy-Malaczynska, Anna
    Leskiewicz, Grzegorz
    Gluszek, Jerzy
    [J]. ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION, 2008, 12 (02): : 109 - 117
  • [22] Increase in life quality (SF-36) after implantation of a knee endoprosthesis
    Jerosch, J
    Floren, M
    [J]. UNFALLCHIRURG, 2000, 103 (05): : 371 - 374
  • [23] Quality of life after stapler haemorrhoidectomy evaluated by SF-36 questionnaire
    Erdogdu, Ahmet
    Sipahioglu, Nurver Turfaner
    Erginoz, Ethem
    Apaydin, Berat
    Sipahioglu, Fikret
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 29 (02) : 59 - 62
  • [24] Tunisian population quality of life: a general analysis using SF-36
    Salem, Safa
    Malouche, Dhafer
    Ben Romdhane, Habiba
    [J]. EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (09) : 613 - 620
  • [25] Quality of life measurement after stroke - Uses and abuses of the SF-36
    Hobart, JC
    Williams, LS
    Moran, K
    Thompson, AJ
    [J]. STROKE, 2002, 33 (05) : 1348 - 1356
  • [26] The evaluation of quality of life in fibromyalgia syndrome: a comparison with rheumatoid arthritis by using SF-36 Health Survey
    Murat Birtane
    Kaan Uzunca
    Nurettin Taştekin
    Hakan Tuna
    [J]. Clinical Rheumatology, 2007, 26 : 679 - 684
  • [27] The evaluation of quality of life in fibromyalgia syndrome: a comparison with rheumatoid arthritis by using SF-36 Health Survey
    Birtane, Murat
    Uzunca, Kaan
    Tastekin, Nurettin
    Tuna, Hakan
    [J]. CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 26 (05) : 679 - 684
  • [28] Comparison of SF-36 and WHOQoL-BREF in Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Abbasi-Ghahramanloo, Abbas
    Soltani-Kermanshahi, Mojtaba
    Mansori, Kamyar
    Khazaei-Pool, Maryam
    Sohrabi, Masoudreza
    Baradaran, Hamid Reza
    Talebloo, Zahra
    Gholami, Ali
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 : 497 - 506
  • [29] Cross-Validation of the Taiwan Version of the Moorehead–Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II with WHOQOL and SF-36
    Chi-Yang Chang
    Chih-Kun Huang
    Yu-Yin Chang
    Chi-Ming Tai
    Jaw-Town Lin
    Jung-Der Wang
    [J]. Obesity Surgery, 2010, 20 : 1568 - 1574
  • [30] The quality of well-being scale: critical similarities and differences with SF-36
    Kaplan, RM
    Ganiats, TG
    Sieber, WJ
    Anderson, JP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1998, 10 (06) : 509 - 520