The effect of jaw position on measures of tongue strength and endurance

被引:50
作者
Solomon, NP [1 ]
Munson, B
机构
[1] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2004年 / 47卷 / 03期
关键词
tongue function; maximum performance tasks; bite block; assessment; surface electromyography;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2004/045)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Assessment of tongue strength and endurance is common in research and clinical contexts. It is unclear whether the results reveal discrete function by the tongue or combined abilities of the tongue and jaw. One way to isolate the movement of the tongue is to constrain the jaw kinematically by using a bite block. In this study, 10 neurologically normal young adults performed tongue strength and endurance tasks without a bite block ( ''jaw-free'') and with bite blocks of various heights (2, 5, 10, and 15 mm for strength; 5 mm for endurance). Data signals included tongue pressure exerted on an air-filled bulb, surface electromyography (SEMG) from the superior tongue blade, and SEMG from 1 masseter. On average, tongue strength (pressure in kPa) was greatest with no bite block and generally decreased as bite blocks increased in height. Pairwise analyses revealed statistically significant differences for all but 3 comparisons (jaw-free to 2 mm, 2 to 5 mm, and 5 to 10 mm). After removing outlying data from 1 participant, tongue endurance at 50% of tongue strength was significantly greater without a bite block than with one. SEMG data did not differ significantly for the strength task across bite block conditions, but inspection of the individual data revealed a tendency for masseter activity to be lower when the jaw was unconstrained. These results suggest that maximal tongue strength and endurance are best assessed with an unconstrained mandible or with a very small bite block.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 594
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A comparison of jaw-opener and jaw-closer muscle activity in humans to overcome an external force counteracting law movement [J].
Abbink, JH ;
van der Bilt, A ;
Bosman, F ;
van der Glas, HW .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 118 (02) :269-278
[2]  
[Anonymous], MOTOR SPEECH DISORDE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System III (Motor Control)
[4]  
Bahr D C., 2001, Oral motor assessment and treatment: Ages and stages
[5]   A MODEL RELATING PATTERNS OF HUMAN JAW MOVEMENT TO BIOMECHANICAL CONSTRAINTS [J].
BARAGAR, FA ;
OSBORN, JW .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1984, 17 (10) :757-767
[6]   ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC HETEROGENEITY IN THE HUMAN TEMPORALIS AND MASSETER MUSCLES DURING STATIC BITING, OPEN CLOSE EXCURSIONS, AND CHEWING [J].
BLANKSMA, NG ;
VANEIJDEN, TMGJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (06) :1318-1327
[7]   A NONINVASIVE INTRAORAL ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ELECTRODE FOR GENIOGLOSSUS MUSCLE [J].
DOBLE, EA ;
LEITER, JC ;
KNUTH, SL ;
DAUBENSPECK, JA ;
BARTLETT, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 58 (04) :1378-1382
[8]  
Duffy JR., 2020, Motor Speech Disorders. Substrates, V4th Edn.)
[9]   JAW-MUSCLE ACTIVITY DURING SPEECH WITH THE MANDIBLE FIXED [J].
FOLKINS, JW ;
ZIMMERMANN, GN .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1981, 69 (05) :1441-1445
[10]   Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue [J].
Gandevia, SC .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2001, 81 (04) :1725-1789