Inferring Species Networks from Gene Trees in High-Polyploid North American and Hawaiian Violets (Viola, Violaceae)

被引:91
作者
Marcussen, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Jakobsen, Kjetill S. [2 ]
Danihelka, Jiri [3 ,4 ]
Ballard, Harvey E. [5 ]
Blaxland, Kim
Brysting, Anne K. [1 ,2 ]
Oxelman, Bengt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Oslo, CEES, Dept Biol, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
[3] Masaryk Univ, Dept Bot & Zool, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic
[4] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Inst Bot, CZ-65720 Brno, Czech Republic
[5] Ohio Univ, Dept Environm & Plant Biol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Allopolyploidy; BEAST; homoeolog loss; low-copy nuclear gene; PADRE; single-molecule PCR; species network; Viola; LOW-COPY NUCLEAR; ALLOPOLYPLOID SPECIATION; CHROMOSOME-NUMBERS; EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS; CONCERTED EVOLUTION; MIOCENE FLORAS; ORIGINS; DNA; SEQUENCES; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1093/sysbio/syr096
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The phylogenies of allopolyploids take the shape of networks and cannot be adequately represented as bifurcating trees. Especially for high polyploids (i.e., organisms with more than six sets of nuclear chromosomes), the signatures of gene homoeolog loss, deep coalescence, and polyploidy may become confounded, with the result that gene trees may be congruent with more than one species network. Herein, we obtained the most parsimonious species network by objective comparison of competing scenarios involving polyploidization and homoeolog loss in a high-polyploid lineage of violets (Viola, Violaceae) mostly or entirely restricted to North America, Central America, or Hawaii. We amplified homoeologs of the low-copy nuclear gene, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI), by single-molecule polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the chloroplast trnL-F region by conventional PCR for 51 species and subspecies. Topological incongruence among GPI homoeolog subclades, owing to deep coalescence and two instances of putative loss (or lack of detection) of homoeologs, were reconciled by applying the maximum tree topology for each subclade. The most parsimonious species network and the fossil-based calibration of the homoeolog tree favored monophyly of the high polyploids, which has resulted from allodecaploidization 9-14 Ma, involving sympatric ancestors from the extant Viola sections Chamaemelanium (diploid), Plagiostigma (paleotetraploid), and Viola (paleotetraploid). Although two of the high-polyploid lineages (Boreali-Americanae, Pedatae) remained decaploid, recurrent polyploidization with tetraploids of section Plagiostigma within the last 5 Ma has resulted in two 14-ploid lineages (Mexicanae, Nosphinium) and one 18-ploid lineage (Langsdorffianae). This implies a more complex phylogenetic and biogeographic origin of the Hawaiian violets (Nosphinium) than that previously inferred from rDNA data and illustrates the necessity of considering polyploidy in phylogenetic and biogeographic reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 126
页数:20
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants [J].
Adams, KL ;
Wendel, JF .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2005, 8 (02) :135-141
[2]   Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference [J].
Alvarez, I ;
Wendel, JF .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2003, 29 (03) :417-434
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_10
[4]  
Arbuzova O.N., 2005, ISKOPAEMYE TSVETKOVY, V4, P48
[5]   Hawaiian angiosperm radiations of North American origin [J].
Baldwin, Bruce G. ;
Wagner, Warren L. .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2010, 105 (06) :849-879
[6]   Shrinking the violets:: Phylogenetic relationships of infrageneric groups in Viola (Violaceae) based on internal transcribed spacer DNA sequences [J].
Ballard, HE ;
Sytsma, KJ ;
Kowal, RR .
SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 1998, 23 (04) :439-458
[7]   Evolution and biogeography of the woody Hawaiian violets (Viola, Violaceae):: Arctic origins, herbaceous ancestry and bird dispersal [J].
Ballard, HE ;
Sytsma, KJ .
EVOLUTION, 2000, 54 (05) :1521-1532
[8]  
Becker W., 1925, Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Parietales und Opuntiales, P363
[9]  
Becker W. A., 1990, Acta Horticulturae, P33
[10]  
BRAINERD E., 1913, B TORREY BOT CLUB, V40, P249