Investment Decisions of Nonprofit Firms: Evidence from Hospitals

被引:28
作者
Adelino, Manuel [1 ]
Lewellen, Katharina [2 ]
Sundaram, Anant [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Tuck Sch Business, Dartmouth, NS, Canada
关键词
CASH FLOW SENSITIVITIES; HEALTH-CARE; ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION; PATIENT PREFERENCES; CORPORATE JETS; COST; OWNERSHIP; INTENSITY; LIQUIDITY; RETURNS;
D O I
10.1111/jofi.12234
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines investment choices of nonprofit hospitals. It tests how shocks to cash flows caused by the performance of the hospitals' financial assets affect hospital expenditures. Capital expenditures increase, on average, by 10 to 28 cents for every dollar received from financial assets. The sensitivity is similar to that found earlier for shareholder-owned corporations. Executive compensation, other salaries, and perks do not respond significantly to cash flow shocks. Hospitals with an apparent tendency to overspend on medical procedures do not exhibit higher investment-cash flow sensitivities. The sensitivities are higher for hospitals that appear financially constrained.
引用
收藏
页码:1583 / 1628
页数:46
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [31] FELDSTEIN MS, 1971, AM ECON REV, V61, P853
  • [32] Precautionary savings and the governance of nonprofit organizations
    Fisman, R
    Hubbard, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (11-12) : 2231 - 2243
  • [33] Gary S., 2007, ABA Property and Probate Journal, P32
  • [34] Gilbert Thomas, 2013, WHY DO U ENDOWMENTS
  • [35] Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment
    Gilchrist, S
    Himmelberg, CP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1995, 36 (03) : 541 - 572
  • [36] Glaeser EL, 2003, NBER CONF R, P1
  • [37] Not-for-profit entrepreneurs
    Glaeser, EL
    Shleifer, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 81 (01) : 99 - 115
  • [38] Glover J A, 1938, Proc R Soc Med, V31, P1219
  • [39] Goetzmann W., 2012, NBER Working Paper No. w18173
  • [40] Financing investment
    Gomes, JF
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) : 1263 - 1285