Results of routine shunting and patch closure during carotid endarterectomy

被引:14
作者
Kret, Marcus R. [1 ]
Young, Brandon [1 ]
Moneta, Gregory L. [1 ]
Liem, Timothy K. [1 ]
Mitchell, Erica L. [1 ]
Azarbal, Amir F. [1 ]
Landry, Gregory J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Vasc Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
Carotid endarterectomy; Shunt; Patch angioplasty; Stroke; CONTRALATERAL SEVERE STENOSIS; ARTERY STUMP PRESSURE; NEUROLOGIC CHANGES; OCCLUSION; CRITERIA; DUPLEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.12.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The role of shunting and patching during carotid endarterectomy remains controversial. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series evaluating consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with routine shunting and patching. The primary endpoints were perioperative stroke, arterial injury, and lesion recurrence by duplex. RESULTS: Of the 220 operations performed, 43% were for symptomatic disease. Successful shunt placement occurred in 98%, with no shunt-related injuries. There was 1 minor perioperative stroke and no major strokes. At a mean follow-up of 24 months (median = 12 months), there was 1 restenosis potentially related to shunt placement. The incidence of asymptomatic >50% stenosis in the patched segment was 8%. CONCLUSIONS: A combined policy of routine shunting and patching simplifies intraoperative decision making with results that rival or exceed those of trials in which their use was not standardized. Shunts need not be avoided because of concern of arterial injury. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 617
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Carotid Endarterectomy with Autoarterial Remodeling of Bifurcation of the Common Carotid Artery and Carotid Endarterectomy with Patch Closure: Comparison of Methods
    Ignatenko, Pavel
    Novikova, Olga
    Gostev, Alexander
    Starodubtsev, Vladimir
    Zeidlits, Galina
    Kuznetsov, Konstantin
    Starodubtseva, Alexandra
    Karpenko, Andrey
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 28 (03) : 741 - 750
  • [22] ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING FOR SELECTIVE SHUNTING DURING CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    FIORI, L
    PARENTI, G
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 7 (03) : 168 - 173
  • [23] Is routine intravascular shunting necessary for carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral occlusion? A review of 5-year experience of carotid endarterectomy with local anaesthesia
    Cinar, B
    Goksel, OS
    Karatepe, C
    Kut, S
    Aydogan, H
    Filizcan, U
    Cetemen, S
    Coruh, T
    Eren, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 28 (05) : 494 - 499
  • [24] The role of patch closure in current-day carotid endarterectomy
    Zaza, Sarah I.
    Bennett, Kyla M.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (01)
  • [25] Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty
    Tokunaga, K
    NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2005, 33 (08): : 759 - 774
  • [27] Five-year outcome of non-shunting and primary closure technique during carotid endarterectomy: a longitudinal cohort study
    Baram, Aram
    Mohammed, Zana A.
    Al-Bajalan, Sarwer Jamal
    Falah, Fitoon
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 50 (04)
  • [28] External carotid artery shunting during carotid endarterectomy: An alternative for cerebral protection?
    Belardi, P
    Finocchi, C
    Lucertini, G
    Viacava, A
    Simoni, G
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 22 (04) : 306 - 309
  • [29] Impact of Shunting Practice Patterns During Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
    Squizzato, Francesco
    Siracuse, Jeffrey J.
    Shuja, Fahad
    Colglazier, Jill
    Wilkins, Parvathi Balachandran
    Goodney, Philip P.
    Brooke, Benjamin Sands
    DeMartino, Randall R.
    STROKE, 2022, 53 (07) : 2230 - 2240
  • [30] Preoperative Digital Carotid Compression as a Predictor of the Need for Shunting During Carotid Endarterectomy
    Naraynsingh, Vijay
    Harnarayan, Patrick
    Maharaj, Ravi
    Dan, Dilip
    Hariharan, Seetharaman
    OPEN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 7 : 110 - 112