Direct recycling of discarded reverse osmosis membranes for domestic wastewater treatment with a focus on water reuse

被引:13
作者
Mejia, Hugo Fernando Giraldo [1 ]
Toledo-Alarcon, Javiera [2 ,3 ]
Rodriguez, Barbara [1 ,5 ]
Cifuentes, Jose Rivas [2 ]
Porre, Francisco Ovalle [4 ]
Haeger, Maria Paz Loebel [4 ]
Ovalle, Natalia Vicencio [1 ]
Astudillo, Carmen Lacoma [2 ]
Garcia, Andreina [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Adv Min Technol Ctr AMTC, Ave Tupper 2007, Santiago 8370451, Chile
[2] Ctr Tecnol Agua, Cetaqua, Pozos 7340, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ Adolfo Ibanez, Fac Ingn & Ciencias, Ave Padre Hurtado 750, Vina Del Mar, Chile
[4] SUEZ Medioambiente, Concepcion 141,oficina 701, Santiago, Chile
[5] Univ Bernardo OHiggins, Ctr Invest Recursos Nat & Sustentabil CIRENYS, Ave Viel 1497, Santiago, Chile
[6] Univ Chile, Min Engn Dept, FCFM, Ave Tupper 2069, Santiago 8370451, Chile
关键词
Desalination; RO membranes; Discarded; Secondary wastewater; Water scarcity; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SEAWATER DESALINATION; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; RO MEMBRANES; PERFORMANCE; SALT; TECHNOLOGIES; RECLAMATION; CHALLENGES; SILICA;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2022.06.031
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The recycling of discarded membranes (end-of-life) represents a relevant alternative for sustainability of reverse osmosis (RO) desalination plants in the context of circular economy. This work evaluated the feasibility of using discarded commercial RO membranes in the treatment of domestic secondary wastewater to obtain water with a certain standard quality. Crossflow filtration tests were conducted to evaluate desalination and wastewater filtration performance at different operating pressures on RO membranes discarded from desalination plans at different working positions (primary M1; secondary M2). The standard manufacturer desalination tests showed a superior performance on M1 membranes, in terms of rejection (similar to 25 LMH, 97%), compared to M2 (similar to 33 LMH, 50%); both having a lower performance than a standard membrane (38 LMH +/- 15%; 99.6%). The failure is sufficient for discarding due to loss of lifespan. Moreover, in wastewater filtration tests using the secondary clarifier outlet effluent from a WWTP at different working pressures, both types of membranes were shown to be effective, with degrees of performance highly dependent on the working pressure. Thus, the operating values of permeate flux/salt rejection were between 56 and 59 LMH/ 96-97% for 600 psi: 33-34 LMH/ 94-96% for 300-psi and in the range of 10-11 LMH/ 90-94% for 80-psi test. Surface characterization of the membrane showed a pressure-related increase in fouling and bacterial adhesion post-filtration. Finally, the operating performance was verified in M1 wastewater filtration at 300 psi over long times (14 h), yielding stable and promising values (similar to 27 LMH; 96%). The permeate obtained has a low concentration of fecal coliforms (< 2 MPN/ 100 mL, 99.99% removal) and meets local standards for irrigation and drinking water in terms of conductivity, phosphorus and nitrogen concentration in treated water. (c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 487
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [31] Hammer Oyvind, 2001, Palaeontologia Electronica, V4, pUnpaginated
  • [32] High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results
    Henmi, M.
    Fusaoka, Y.
    Tomioka, H.
    Kurihara, M.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 62 (09) : 2134 - 2140
  • [33] Current situation and major challenges of desalination in Chile
    Herrera-Leon, Sebastian
    Cruz, Constanza
    Kraslawski, Andrzej
    Cisternas, Luis A.
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2019, 171 : 93 - 104
  • [34] Life-cycle assessment of two potable water reuse technologies: MF/RO/UV-AOP treatment and hybrid osmotic membrane bioreactors
    Holloway, Ryan W.
    Miller-Robbie, Leslie
    Patel, Mehul
    Stokes, Jennifer R.
    Munakata-Marr, Junko
    Dadakis, Jason
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2016, 507 : 165 - 178
  • [35] Hubert E, 2015, WATER SA, V41, P490, DOI [10.4314/wsa.v41i4.08, 10.4314/WSA.V41I4.08]
  • [36] Performance evaluation of reverse osmosis (RO) pre-treatment technologies for in-land brackish water treatment
    Khanzada, N. K.
    Khan, S. Jamal
    Davies, P. A.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2017, 406 : 44 - 50
  • [37] Evaluation of anti -bacterial adhesion performance of polydopamine cross-linked graphene oxide RO membrane via in situ optical coherence tomography
    Khanzada, Noman Khalid
    Rehman, Shazia
    Leu, Shao-Yuan
    An, Alicia Kyoungjin
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2020, 479
  • [38] Enhanced or reduced concentration polarization by membrane fouling in seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) processes
    Kim, Suhan
    Lee, Sungyun
    Lee, Eunkyung
    Sarper, Sarp
    Kim, Chung-Hwan
    Cho, Jaeweon
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 247 (1-3) : 162 - 168
  • [39] Assessment of bacterial viability: a comprehensive review on recent advances and challenges
    Kumar, Shravanthi S.
    Ghosh, Asit Ranjan
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2019, 165 (06): : 593 - 610
  • [40] Mega-ton Water System: Japanese national research and development project on seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation
    Kurihara, Masaru
    Hanakawa, Masayuki
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2013, 308 : 131 - 137