Uptake of faecal immunochemical test screening among nonparticipants in a flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme

被引:23
|
作者
Hol, Lieke [1 ]
Kuipers, Ernst J. [1 ,2 ]
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein [3 ]
van Vuuren, Anneke J. [1 ]
Reijerink, Jaqueline C. I. Y. [4 ]
Habbema, Dik J. F. [3 ]
van Leerdam, Monique E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Canc Screening Org SW Netherlands, Vlaardingen, Netherlands
关键词
colorectal cancer; screening; faecal immunochemical test; flexible sigmoidoscopy; noncompliance; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; BASE-LINE FINDINGS; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PATIENT PREFERENCES; PREVENTION; POLYPECTOMY; COLONOSCOPY; POPULATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.26260
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Screening programmes based on single modality testing may prevent individuals with a preference for a different test from participating. We conducted a population-based trial to determine whether nonparticipants in flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening were willing to attend faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening. In total, 8,407 subjects were invited in a primary FS screening programme. Invitees did not know at the time of FS invitation that nonparticipants would be offered FIT screening. A total of 4,407 nonparticipants of FS screening were invited for FIT screening (cut-off 50 ng haemoglobin/ml). The participation rate to FS screening was 31% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3032%]. Among the FS nonparticipants 25% (CI: 2426%) did attended FIT screening. The participation rate of the two-stage recruitment for FS and FIT screening was 45% (CI: 4446%). FIT screenees were older (p = 0.02), more often women (p < 0.001) and had a lower social economic status (p = 0.01) than FS screenees. The detection rate (DR) for advanced adenoma was 3.5% (CI: 2.54.8%), and for colorectal cancer (CRC) it was 0.3% (CI: 0.10.8%) among participants to FIT screening. The DR of the two-stage recruitment was 6.1% (n = 202) for an advanced adenoma and 0.5% (n = 16) for a CRC. In conclusion, offering FIT screening to nonparticipants in a FS screening programme increases the overall participation rate considerably, as a quarter of nonparticipants of FS screening was willing to attend FIT screening. The participation rate remains lower for primary FIT screening in the same population (62%). Women in the target population were more likely to refuse FS than FIT screening. Countries introducing FS screening should be aware of these preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:2096 / 2102
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characteristics of nonparticipants in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial comparing sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical testing
    Botteri, Edoardo
    Hoff, Geir
    Randel, Kristin R.
    Holme, Oyvind
    de Lange, Thomas
    Bernklev, Tomm
    Aas, Eline
    Berthelsen, Mona
    Natvig, Erik
    Kirkoen, Benedicte
    Knudsen, Markus D.
    Kvaerner, Ane S.
    Schult, Anna L.
    Ursin, Giske
    Jorgensen, Anita
    Berstad, Paula
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 151 (03) : 361 - 371
  • [2] Implementation of a mailed faecal immunochemical test programme for colorectal cancer screening among Veterans
    Deeds, Stefanie Ann
    Moore, Christopher B.
    Gunnink, Eric J.
    Wheat, Chelle L.
    Robinson, Amy E.
    Bomsztyk, Mayan D.
    Geyer, John R.
    Chen, Anders
    Godbout, Regina M.
    Nelson, Karin M.
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    Reddy, Ashok
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (04)
  • [3] Screening for colorectal cancer: flexible sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood immunochemical testing. Which test is superior?
    Castiglione, Guido
    GUT, 2010, 59 (01) : 9 - 10
  • [4] Screening for colorectal cancer: Comparison of perceived test burden of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test and flexible sigmoidoscopy
    Hol, L.
    de Jonge, V.
    van Leerdam, M. E.
    van Ballegooijen, M.
    Looman, C. W. N.
    van Vuuren, A. J.
    Reijerink, J. C. I. Y.
    Habbema, J. D. F.
    Essink-Bot, M. L.
    Kuipers, E. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (11) : 2059 - 2066
  • [5] Improving uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a randomized trial of nonparticipant reminders in the English Screening Programme
    Kerrison, Robert S.
    McGregor, LesleyM.
    Marshall, Sarah
    Isitt, John
    Counsell, Nicholas
    Rees, Colin J.
    von Wagner, Christian
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [6] Uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening - Reply
    Wardle, J
    Atkin, W
    LANCET, 2002, 360 (9340): : 1172 - 1173
  • [7] The impact of driving time on participation in colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical blood test
    Berthelsen, Mona
    Berstad, Paula
    Randel, Kristin R.
    Hoff, Geir
    Natvig, Erik
    Holme, Oyvind
    Botteri, Edoardo
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 80
  • [8] The UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial: Uptake and Outcomes of First Round Faecal Occult Blood Testing in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme
    Kralj-Hans, Ines
    Wooldrage, Kate
    Moss, Sue
    Patnick, Julietta
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Atkin, Wendy S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 144 (05) : S45 - S45
  • [9] Colorectal Cancer Screening: Fecal immunochemical Test or Sigmoidoscopy?
    Hofmann-Assmus, Marion
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2021, 59 (07): : 626 - 628
  • [10] Effect of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on the outcomes of subsequent faecal occult blood test screening
    Brown, Jeremy P.
    Wooldrage, Kate
    Kralj-Hans, Ines
    Wright, Suzanne
    Cross, Amanda J.
    Atkin, Wendy S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2019, 26 (01) : 11 - 18