Effect of estrous detection strategy on pregnancy outcomes of lactating Holstein cows receiving artificial insemination and embryo transfer

Objectives of the current experiment were to evaluate the effects on reproductive performance of adding an automated estrous detection (AED) device to the reproductive management of Holstein cows. In addition, we aimed to determine whether the AED device would equally influence the reproductive performance of cows receiving artificial insemination and those receiving embryo transfer. Cows (n = 1,244) were observed daily for estrous detection by trained farm personnel with the aid of a tail head mounting device. Cows (n = 641) enrolled in the AED treatment were fitted with a neck-mounted automated estrus detection device, and cows enrolled in the control (CTRL, n = 603) treatment were not fitted with the AED device. Cows not detected in estrus by 54 ± 3 DIM received 1 injection of PGF2α, and those not detected in estrus by 68 ± 3 DIM were enrolled in an ovulation synchronization protocol. The hazard of first service tended to be affected by treatment [CTRL: referent, AED: adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.98, 1.25], and we determined a tendency for the AED treatment to reduce the proportion of cows receiving the first service at fixed time (39.7 ± 5.7 vs. 45.5 ± 5.8%). After the first service, high-producing cows enrolled in the AED treatment were more likely to be pregnant (19.1 ± 2.4 vs. 31.8 ± 3.0%), but no differences between the AED and CTRL treatments were observed among low-producing cows (24.9 ± 2.9 vs. 24.7 ± 2.9%). The hazard of second service was affected by treatment (CTRL: referent, AED: AHR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.47), and the AED treatment reduced the proportion of cows receiving the second service at fixed time compared with the CTRL treatment (15.7 ± 2.2 vs. 21.9 ± 2.5%). After the second service, the AED treatment tended to increase the proportion of cows pregnant (31.0 ± 3.0 vs. 24.9 ± 2.6%) and tended to reduce the proportion of cows that lost pregnancy between the first and second pregnancy exams (9.7 ± 3.3 vs. 16.7 ± 4.6%). The interaction between treatment and type of service did not affect percentage of cows pregnant and pregnancy loss to the first and second services. The hazard of pregnancy was affected by the interaction between treatment and milk yield, in that cows with above the median milk yield in the AED treatment became pregnant at a faster rate than CTRL cows, but no difference between treatments was observed among cows with milk yield below the median. Cows with above the median milk yield had shorter duration of estrus and were less likely to have activity peak at estrus ≥89 (0 = minimum, 100 = maximum). The current experiment suggests that AED devices may improve reproductive performance not only by increasing service rates but also by improving accuracy of estrous detection. According to the current experiment, high-producing cows may benefit most from the addition of AED devices to reproductive management. © 2020 American Dairy Science Association