Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

被引:21
作者
Nuzum, Nathan D. [1 ]
Hendy, Ashlee M. [1 ]
Russell, Aaron P. [2 ]
Teo, Wei-Peng [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Exercise & Nutr Sci, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, IPAN, Geelong, Vic, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2016年 / 10卷
关键词
anodal tDCS; transcranial magnetic stimulation; latency; I-waves; short intracortical facilitation; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; PAIRED-PULSE TMS; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; I-WAVES; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; HUMANS; TDCS; FACILITATION; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2016.00487
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Individual responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are varied and therefore potentially limit its application. There is evidence that this variability is related to the contributions of Indirect waves (I-waves) recruited in the cortex. The latency of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) can be measured through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), allowing an individual's responsiveness to tDCS to be determined. However, this single-pulse method requires several different orientations of the TMS coil, potentially affecting its reliability. Instead, we propose a paired-pulse TMS paradigm targeting I-waves as an alternative method. This method uses one orientation that reduces inter- and intra-trial variability. It was hypothesized that the paired-pulse method would correlate more highly to tDCS responses than the single-pulse method. In a randomized, double blinded, cross-over design, 30 healthy participants completed two sessions, receiving 20 min of either anodal (2 mA) or sham tDCS. TMS was used to quantify Short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) at Inter stimulus intervals (ISIs) of 1.5, 3.5 and 4.5 ms. Latency was determined in the posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior (AP) and latero-medial (LM) coil orientations. The relationship between latency, SICF measures and the change in suprathreshold MEP amplitude size following tDCS were determined with Pearson's correlations. TMS measures, SICI and SICF were also used to determine responses to Anodal-tDCS (a-tDCS). Neither of the latency differences nor the SICF measures correlated to the change in MEP amplitude from pre-post tDCS (all P > 0.05). Overall, there was no significant response to tDCS in this cohort. This study highlights the need for testing the effects of various tDCS protocols on the different I-waves. Further research into SICF and whether it is a viable measure of I-wave facilitation is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene polymorphisms shape cortical plasticity in humans
    Antal, Andrea
    Chaieb, Leila
    Moliadze, Vera
    Monte-Silva, Katia
    Poreisz, Csaba
    Thirugnanasambandam, Nivethida
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Shoukier, Moneef
    Ludwig, Harald
    Paulus, Walter
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2010, 3 (04) : 230 - 237
  • [2] Boroojerdi B, 2000, MUSCLE NERVE, V23, P1594, DOI 10.1002/1097-4598(200010)23:10<1594::AID-MUS19>3.3.CO
  • [3] 2-V
  • [4] Neuromodulation by paired-pulse TMS at an I-wave interval facilitates multiple I-waves
    Cash, R. F. H.
    Benwell, N. M.
    Murray, K.
    Mastaglia, F. L.
    Thickbroom, G. W.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 193 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [5] Predicting Modulation in Corticomotor Excitability and in Transcallosal Inhibition in Response to Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Davidson, Travis W.
    Bolic, Miodrag
    Tremblay, Francois
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [6] ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX - SURFACE EMG AND SINGLE MOTOR UNIT RESPONSES
    DAY, BL
    DRESSLER, D
    DENOORDHOUT, AM
    MARSDEN, CD
    NAKASHIMA, K
    ROTHWELL, JC
    THOMPSON, PD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1989, 412 : 449 - 473
  • [7] Direct demonstration of the effect of lorazepam on the excitability of the human motor cortex
    Di Lazzaro, V
    Oliviero, A
    Meglio, M
    Cioni, B
    Tamburrini, G
    Tonali, P
    Rothwell, JC
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 111 (05) : 794 - 799
  • [8] I-wave origin and modulation
    Di Lazzaro, V.
    Profice, P.
    Ranieri, F.
    Capone, F.
    Dileone, M.
    Oliviero, A.
    Pilato, F.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (04) : 512 - 525
  • [9] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on the Excitability of Corticospinal Axons of the Human Cerebral Cortex
    Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo
    Ranieri, Federico
    Profice, Paolo
    Pilato, Fabio
    Mazzone, Paolo
    Capone, Fioravante
    Insola, Angelo
    Oliviero, Antonio
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (04) : 641 - 643
  • [10] Transcranial DC stimulation (OCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation
    Gandiga, PC
    Hummel, FC
    Cohen, LG
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (04) : 845 - 850