Biomarker-Guided Assessment of Acute Kidney Injury Phenotypes E among ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

被引:2
|
作者
Banai, Ariel [1 ]
Frydman, Shir [1 ]
Abu Katash, Hytham [1 ]
Stark, Moshe [1 ]
Goldiner, Ilana [1 ]
Banai, Shmuel [1 ]
Shacham, Yacov [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Sackler Fac Med, 6 Weizman St, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
AKI; STEMI; neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; complications; biomarkers; novel; phenotypes; GELATINASE-ASSOCIATED LIPOCALIN; URINARY BIOMARKERS; RENAL IMPAIRMENT; HEART-FAILURE; NGAL; AKI; CRITERIA; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11185402
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Recent practice guidelines recommended the use of new stress, functional, and damage biomarkers in clinical practice to prevent and manage acute kidney injury (AKI). Biomarkers are one of the tools used to define various AKI phenotypes and provide prognostic information regardless of an acute decline in renal function. We investigated the incidence and possible implications of AKI phenotypes among ST elevation myocardial infarction patient treated with primary coronary intervention. We included 281 patients with STEMI treated with PCI. Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) was utilized to determine structural renal damage and functional AKI was determined using the KDIGO criteria. Patients were stratified into four AKI phenotypes: no AKI, subclinical AKI, hemodynamic AKI, and severe AKI. Patients were assessed for in-hospital adverse events (MACE). A total of 46 patients (44%) had subclinical AKI, 17 (16%) had hemodynamic AKI, and 42 (40%) had severe AKI. We observed a gradual and significant increase in the occurrence of MACE between the groups being highest among patients with severe AKI (10% vs. 19% vs. 29% vs. 43%; p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression model, any AKI phenotype was independently associated with MACE with an odds ratio of 4.15 (95% CI 2.1-8.3, p < 0.001,) for subclinical AKI, 4.51 (95% CI 1.61-12.69; p = 0.004) for hemodynamic AKI, and 12.9 (95% CI 5.59-30.1, p < 0.001) for severe AKI. In conclusion, among STEMI patients, AKI is a heterogeneous condition consisting of distinct phenotypes, addition of novel biomarkers may overcome the limitations of sCr-based AKI definitions to improve AKI phenotyping and direct potential therapies.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk factors associated with contrast-associated acute kidney injury in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ye, Jiahao
    Liu, Chaoyun
    Deng, Zhanyu
    Zhu, Youfeng
    Zhang, Shaoheng
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [32] A System of Care for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in India The Tamil Nadu-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Program
    Alexander, Thomas
    Mullasari, Ajit S.
    Joseph, George
    Kannan, Kumaresan
    Veerasekar, Ganesh
    Victor, Suma M.
    Ayers, Colby
    Thomson, Viji Samuel
    Subban, Vijayakumar
    Gnanaraj, Justin Paul
    Narula, Jagat
    Kumbhani, Dharam J.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (05) : 498 - 505
  • [33] Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Adrenal Insufficiency
    Abdallah, Nadhem
    Mohamoud, Abdilahi
    Ismayl, Mahmoud
    Aronow, Herbert D.
    Abdallah, Meriam
    Goldsweig, Andrew M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ENDOCRINE SOCIETY, 2024, 8 (12)
  • [34] The Usefulness of Intracoronary Imaging in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Karamasis, Grigoris V.
    Varlamos, Charalampos
    Benetou, Despoina-Rafailia
    Kalogeropoulos, Andreas S.
    Keeble, Thomas R.
    Tsigkas, Grigorios
    Xenogiannis, Iosif
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [36] Contemporary management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Ajay Yadlapati
    Mark Gajjar
    Daniel R. Schimmel
    Mark J. Ricciardi
    James D. Flaherty
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2016, 11 : 1107 - 1113
  • [37] Preventive angioplasty in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Mallikethi-Reddy, Sagar
    Jagadeesh, Kavyashri
    Zalawadiya, Sandip
    Afonso, Luis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 172 (01) : 249 - 249
  • [38] Contemporary management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Yadlapati, Ajay
    Gajjar, Mark
    Schimmel, Daniel R.
    Ricciardi, Mark J.
    Flaherty, James D.
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 11 (08) : 1107 - 1113
  • [39] Anemia and Inflammation in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Zhang, Enyuan
    Li, Zhenyu
    Che, Jingjin
    Chen, Xin
    Qin, Tiantian
    Tong, Qing
    Zhao, Weiwei
    Li, Guangping
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 349 (06) : 493 - 498
  • [40] An Unusual Cause of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Ferre Vallverdu, Maria
    Heredia Cambra, Tomas
    Sanz Sanchez, Jorge
    Luis Diez Gil, Jose
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (09) : 961 - 962