Some Criteria for Acceptable Abstraction

被引:8
作者
Linnebo, Oystein [1 ]
机构
[1] Birkbeck Univ London, London, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
abstraction; bad company problem; conservativeness; unboundedness; stability; irenicity;
D O I
10.1215/00294527-1435492
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Which abstraction principles are acceptable? A variety of criteria have been proposed, in particular irenicity, stability, conservativeness, and unboundedness. This note charts their logical relations. This answers sonic open questions and corrects some old answers.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 338
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PHILOSOPHIA MATH 3, DOI DOI 10.1093/PHILMAT/8.2.100
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, REASONS PROPER STUDY
[3]  
Boolos G., 1995, MEANING METHOD ESSAY, P234
[4]  
Boolos George., 1998, LOGIC LOGIC LOGIC
[5]  
Cook R., BRIT J PHIL IN PRESS, P337
[6]   Introduction [J].
Linnebo, Oystein .
SYNTHESE, 2009, 170 (03) :321-329
[7]   Which Abstraction Principles are Acceptable? Some Limitative Results [J].
Linnebo, Oystein ;
Uzquiano, Gabriel .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2009, 60 (02) :239-252
[8]  
Shapiro S., 2000, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, V41, P335, DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1038336880
[9]  
Shapiro S., 1991, OXFORD SCI PUBLICATI, V17
[10]   The Company Kept by Cut Abstraction (and its Relatives)† [J].
Shapiro, Stewart .
PHILOSOPHIA MATHEMATICA, 2011, 19 (02) :107-138